2005
DOI: 10.1038/ng1105-1155
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMPReSS: standardized phenotype screens for functional annotation of the mouse genome

Abstract: Peer reviewe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, oral administration of LPS is less common, perhaps because it is non-toxic to healthy mice even at doses 16.5X greater than that used here (Harper et al, 2011). Consistent with this report, we did not observe obvious signs of sickness, including changes in body position (hunched back, lying on side, or prone), sustained eye closure, piloerection, dragging or elevated tail position, or failure to respond to finger stroke of the back (Brown et al, 2005, Hines et al, 2013). We recorded these observations, rectal temperature, and body weight between 9:00–10:00 am on day −1 to day 7 post-ingestion in a subset of mice (n=12).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, oral administration of LPS is less common, perhaps because it is non-toxic to healthy mice even at doses 16.5X greater than that used here (Harper et al, 2011). Consistent with this report, we did not observe obvious signs of sickness, including changes in body position (hunched back, lying on side, or prone), sustained eye closure, piloerection, dragging or elevated tail position, or failure to respond to finger stroke of the back (Brown et al, 2005, Hines et al, 2013). We recorded these observations, rectal temperature, and body weight between 9:00–10:00 am on day −1 to day 7 post-ingestion in a subset of mice (n=12).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In parallel, a number of past and ongoing standardized phenotyping projects have documented traits in inbred strains and mutant lines for phenotypes relevant to human disease, including the Mouse Phenome Project, the European Mouse Disease Clinic (EUMODIC) and the Mouse Genetics Project (MGP; based at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute); see also Table 2[81-84]. The results from many screens are made available online, enabling researchers to identify potentially interesting phenotypes for detailed analysis (Figure 2).…”
Section: Mouse Genetics On a Grand Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were assessed for dysmorphology as described (European Mouse Phenotyping Resource of Standardised Screens [EMPReSS]) 36. Anaesthetized mice were assessed by digital radiography at 26 kV for 3 s using a Faxitron MX‐20 digital X‐ray system (Faxitron X‐ray Corporation, Lincolnshire, IL, USA)34 and DXA using a Lunar PIXImus densitometer (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK), as reported 37.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%