2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EMT–MET in renal disease: Should we curb our enthusiasm?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Renal tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is regarded as an important cause leading to renal interstitial fibrosis [1,2], but this issue remains controversial [3,4]. The EMT process is characterized by the loss of epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and cytokeratin, and the acquisition of new mesenchymal markers, including vimentin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), fibroblast-specific protein-1 (Fsp-1) and fibronectin [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renal tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is regarded as an important cause leading to renal interstitial fibrosis [1,2], but this issue remains controversial [3,4]. The EMT process is characterized by the loss of epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and cytokeratin, and the acquisition of new mesenchymal markers, including vimentin, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), fibroblast-specific protein-1 (Fsp-1) and fibronectin [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the clear incorporation of the majority of such cells within the proximal-tubule walls under both normal (unoperated/sham-operated) and pathological situations (UUO), the morphology of which suggests a spectrum of differentiation from a primitive form to a mature tubular cell. In addition, their staining against mesenchymal proteins (e.g., vimentin) could be construed as indicative of their existence in a relatively stable state of “epithelial phenotypic change” such as postulated for epithelial cells by Galichon et al (2013). While not found throughout the entire proximal tubule, the distribution of diformazan-positive cells is more or less random (“stochastic”) within the S3 segment, that portion of the proximal tubule shown to be the most susceptible to damaging conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actuellement, la description des phé nomè nes de TEM, incluant l'acquisition de capacité de migration et d'invasion des cellules é pithé liales, reste controversé e [11]. Il est cependant admis que la souffrance des cellules tubulaires serait à l'origine d'une reprogrammation cellulaire au cours de laquelle les cellules é pithé liales subiraient des modifications phé notypiques et exprimeraient des marqueurs mé senchymateux [12].…”
Section: Fibrogenè Se Ré Naleunclassified