2013
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2013-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emulating boreal forest disturbance dynamics: Can we maintain timber supply, aboriginal land use, and woodland caribou habitat?

Abstract: The effects on timber supply incurred by implementing an ecosystem-based management strategy were evaluated in an eastern Canadian boreal forest management unit. Standard linear programming was used to test the effects of four key policy issues: (1) aim for a targeted forest age structure inspired by natural fire regime and forest dynamics (multi-cohort approach), (2) agglomerate harvest blocks in operating areas to reproduce natural disturbance patterns at the landscape scale, (3) maintain cumulated clearcutt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, uncertainties about future events are addressed as they arise rather than formally incorporated into plans. In much of Canada's boreal forest, for example, the annual allowable cut does not explicitly consider fire or recurrent insect epidemic risks and is only revised a posteriori following a large disturbance (Dhital et al 2013). Rather than focusing on a single, optimal vision of the future, forest managers should use adaptive management or scenario building models to explore an envelope of probable futures that becomes wider the further forward one projects (Lempert 2002, Parrott and Meyer 2012.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, uncertainties about future events are addressed as they arise rather than formally incorporated into plans. In much of Canada's boreal forest, for example, the annual allowable cut does not explicitly consider fire or recurrent insect epidemic risks and is only revised a posteriori following a large disturbance (Dhital et al 2013). Rather than focusing on a single, optimal vision of the future, forest managers should use adaptive management or scenario building models to explore an envelope of probable futures that becomes wider the further forward one projects (Lempert 2002, Parrott and Meyer 2012.…”
Section: Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions could thus be different in contexts where timber value is higher relative to the operational costs, thus increasing the profitability of partial harvests relative to clearcuts. Similarly, the needs of specific stakeholders, such as local resident populations or first nations, were not considered directly in the implementation of the model, but would obviously have a major influence on harvest patterns by further restricting the use of clear-cutting, which could indirectly give more importance to partial cuts (Dhital et al 2013, Yelle 2013.…”
Section: Impacts On Harvestable Volumes In Different Types Of Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though this approach may often lead to emulate spatial patterns of natural disturbances [1], it may not be entirely compatible with wildlife habitat protection and community expectations for lower-impact forestry. Considerations of these social and environmental issues lead to smaller and more dispersed cut-block areas, which reduced wood volumes available for harvest [2]. In effect, this leads to an increased dispersion of harvest areas across the landscape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%