2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15134525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emulating Deep-Sea Bioremediation: Oil Plume Degradation by Undisturbed Deep-Sea Microbial Communities Using a High-Pressure Sampling and Experimentation System

Abstract: Hydrocarbon biodegradation rates in the deep-sea have been largely determined under atmospheric pressure, which may lead to non-representative results. In this work, we aim to study the response of deep-sea microbial communities of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (EMS) to oil contamination at in situ environmental conditions and provide representative biodegradation rates. Seawater from a 600 to 1000 m depth was collected using a high-pressure (HP) sampling device equipped with a unidirectional check-valve, with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were injected diluted in 100 μL ultrapure DCM and spiked with the IS to 100 ppb concentration. The aromatic hydrocarbon components were quantified against the internal standard using an assumed response factor of 1 (see Antoniou et al (2022) 47 for further details regarding the instrumental analysis parameters). The precision of the analytical method, evaluated in terms of the repeatability of the experimental results (n = 8; in spiked samples) and expressed in terms of relative standard deviation, was ranged from 1.6 to 4.2% for individual PAHs.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were injected diluted in 100 μL ultrapure DCM and spiked with the IS to 100 ppb concentration. The aromatic hydrocarbon components were quantified against the internal standard using an assumed response factor of 1 (see Antoniou et al (2022) 47 for further details regarding the instrumental analysis parameters). The precision of the analytical method, evaluated in terms of the repeatability of the experimental results (n = 8; in spiked samples) and expressed in terms of relative standard deviation, was ranged from 1.6 to 4.2% for individual PAHs.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%