Enabling access to direct payments: An exploration of care co-ordinators decision-making practices

Abstract

Background: Increasing demands for the greater take-up of direct payments necessitates the willingness and ability of care co-ordinators to be able to meet this challenge. Aim: To consider how workers have responded to direct payments in practice and how they can enable or limit greater access. Method: The analysis presented here is primarily based on 20 in-depth interviews with care coordinators who took part in an evaluation of a national pilot to implement direct payments in mental health. Results: Three key responses were identified which mediated care co-ordinators' pursuit of direct payments as an option for clients: using selective criteria; incorporating it into a dominant framework (of 'providing services') and re-conceptualizing their role as enabling greater capacity for choice and control. In order to make sense of these responses it was necessary to examine their conflicting work context. Conclusions: Initiatives such as direct payments suggest the need to re-appraise the role of care coordinators and may require a significant shift in the focus of their practice. Whilst tensions inherent in their role may make this shift difficult, the analysis also suggests that it could lead to opportunities for putting into practice ideas about user empowerment which should be central to their practice. Declaration of Interest: None.

Opportunities for independent living using direct payments in mental health

“…2000, Ridley & Jones 2002) take up was slow. In addition, the length of time it took to process and set up direct payment packages, particularly if recipients employed their own PAs, meant that most recipients only started using direct payments in the last year of the national pilot (Spandler & Vick 2004, 2005). Therefore, the evaluation was only able to report on relatively short‐term and early reported benefits for the small numbers of people who took part.…”

Embarking on self-directed support in Scotland: a focused scoping review of the literature

“…One limit of accounts citing such problems is the lack of detailed examination of possible delays. We know surprisingly little about the reasons for any tardiness, and this runs the risk of classifying social workers under the overarching, negative term 'bureaucracy' or positioning them merely as recalcitrant social workers or describing them as mere 'streetlevel bureaucrats' (Spandler & Vick, 2005). Policy-makers may lack understanding of the contextual constraints (Dawson, 2009).…”

The impact of risk management practice upon the implementation of recovery-oriented care in community mental health services: a qualitative investigation

“…In a focus group study exploring attitudes towards the social inclusion agenda, mental health workers reported an over-emphasis on managing risk that regularly acted as a barrier to the promotion of service users' social inclusion (Bertram & Stickely, 2005). In an in-depth interview study exploring attitudes towards implementing direct payments (Spandler & Vick, 2005), care coordinators reported finding it difficult to involve clients in their care when there was 'an over-whelming focus on risk' in their service (Spandler & Vick, 2005: 152). Marwaha & Johnson (2005) conducted semi-structured interviews with people who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder in order to explore their views and experiences of employment.…”