2017
DOI: 10.21201/2017.0292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling Access to Non-Food Items in an Emergency Response: A review of Oxfam programmes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent review of Oxfam programs 30 reported that cash programs were found to be more likely to contribute to restoring dignity in displaced populations and that there was little evidence of neglected hygiene-related purchasing through the use of cash models. The author went on to reiterate that impact must be monitored to ensure that women were able to manage menstruation in an adequate manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review of Oxfam programs 30 reported that cash programs were found to be more likely to contribute to restoring dignity in displaced populations and that there was little evidence of neglected hygiene-related purchasing through the use of cash models. The author went on to reiterate that impact must be monitored to ensure that women were able to manage menstruation in an adequate manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type of paper Primary research (Reed and Coates, 2012;Shah, 2012;Bastable and Russell, 2013;House, 2013;van der Gaag, 2013;International Medical Corps, 2014;Mena, 2015;Giardina et al, 2016;Ndlovu and Bhala, 2016;Sommer et al, 2016Sommer et al, , 2018Abu Hamad et al, 2017;Ferron, 2017;Human Rights Watch, 2017;UN Women, 2017;Joint Agency Research Report, 2018;Madigan, 2019;Shaphren and Cuadra, 2019;Toma, 2019) (37)…”
Section: Characteristic Category Number Of Papers (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product affordability did not feature heavily in the literature searched, other than noting that the relative affordability of different menstrual materials might influence people's preferences (House et al, 2012). However, the affordability of menstrual materials against other needs was flagged as an important issue in using cash transfers or voucher schemes in emergency settings (Ferron, 2017). Women interviewed about cash transfers for non-food items often preferred vouchers for specific items because they could be sure they could access the items they needed (Ferron, 2017).…”
Section: Resource Limitations-economic Environment: Product a Ordabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations