2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enabling ambulatory movement in wearable magnetoencephalography with matrix coil active magnetic shielding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar dry phantom design resulted in 1-2mm localization error when used in a whole head SQUID MEG system, although this accuracy was achieved after re-calibration of the phantom [20]. In OPM MEG, similar or better localization accuracy has been reported for a dry phantom, however dipole magnitudes in this case were on the order of 1 uAm, which is two orders of magnitude larger than brain activity [14,33]. Phantom localization error of 5 mm was found for a 1-cm current source inside of a saline solution sphere using OPM MEG sensors [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A similar dry phantom design resulted in 1-2mm localization error when used in a whole head SQUID MEG system, although this accuracy was achieved after re-calibration of the phantom [20]. In OPM MEG, similar or better localization accuracy has been reported for a dry phantom, however dipole magnitudes in this case were on the order of 1 uAm, which is two orders of magnitude larger than brain activity [14,33]. Phantom localization error of 5 mm was found for a 1-cm current source inside of a saline solution sphere using OPM MEG sensors [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Secondly, closed-loop operation means that sensor output remains linear even when the sensors move through a large background field; this enables sensors to keep working when the subject moves (as demonstrated in Figure 4). In previous demonstrations of free movement (Holmes et al, 2018(Holmes et al, , 2023Rea et al, 2022), sensor linearity has been enabled by the use of large coils -either mounted on planes each side of the subject, or within the MSR walls -which create a zero field volume enclosing the head. In principle, closed-loop operation offers an alternative to use of such coils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptability also means arrays can be designed to optimise sensitivity to specific effects (Hill et al, 2024) or brain areas (Lin et al, 2019; Tierney, Levy, et al, 2021). As the sensors move with the head, participants can move freely during recordings (assuming background fields are well controlled) (Holmes et al, 2018, 2019, 2023; Rea et al, 2021). This enables the recording of data during novel tasks (Boto et al, 2018; Rea et al, 2022) or even epileptic seizures (Feys, et al, 2023; Hillebrand et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MEG normally requires the detection of both magnetic fields and magnetic field gradients, with the latter enabling higher spatial resolution and better localization of the biomagnetic source [25][26][27][28]. In general, the measurement of the small magnetic fields produced by the human body is strongly affected by environmental magnetic field noise, whose cancellation and shielding is expensive and cumbersome [21,[29][30][31]. Measuring magnetic field gradients can help in circumventing or simplifying this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%