2019
DOI: 10.1080/0966369x.2019.1596883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting intersectional multilayered citizenship: Kurdish women’s politics

Abstract: Focusing on the institutional aspects of the Kurdish women's movement in Turkey since the 1990s the article shows how it established a consciousness within the Kurdish national movement that gender equality is a cornerstone of democracy and ethnic rights. We frame this through theories of enacting intersectional multilayered citizenship and identify three key interventions: autonomous women's assemblies, women's quotas in pro-Kurdish rights parties and the cochair system where all elected positions within the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the exile of many Kurdish nationalists to Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt, the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923 created a problematic issue for Kurdish nationalism in general and Kurdish female emancipation in particular. This was due both to patriarchal structures in society and to the particular political movement in Turkey, characterized by “assimilationist policies” (Erel & Acik, 2020, p. 480). Considering such oppression, the “Kurdishness” of the Kurdish question was consistently ignored by the Turkish state until the end of the 1980s.…”
Section: Turkey (Bakur)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the exile of many Kurdish nationalists to Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt, the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923 created a problematic issue for Kurdish nationalism in general and Kurdish female emancipation in particular. This was due both to patriarchal structures in society and to the particular political movement in Turkey, characterized by “assimilationist policies” (Erel & Acik, 2020, p. 480). Considering such oppression, the “Kurdishness” of the Kurdish question was consistently ignored by the Turkish state until the end of the 1980s.…”
Section: Turkey (Bakur)mentioning
confidence: 99%