1983
DOI: 10.1177/00220345830620120801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enamel Demineralization by Mouthrinses Containing Different Concentrations of Sucrose

Abstract: Intra-oral enamel demineralization tests, involving rinsing with sucrose solutions (5, 1, 0.5, or 0.3%) at varying frequencies during a 1.5-hour period, showed that demineralization was a function of the total sugar dose (frequency of rinsing times concentration). Two rinses with a 5% solution caused demineralization, nine rinses were needed in the case of a 0.5% solution, and none occurred after nine rinses with a 0.3% solution. Remineralization was also observed and apparently occurred after exhaustion of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with a recent finding involving the intraoral demineralization test which showed that demineralization is a function of total sugar exposure [Tehrani et al, 1983]. 2 rinses with a 5% solution caused demineralization; 6 rinses were needed with a 1 % solution, 9 rinses with 0.5%, and no demineralization was ob served with 9 rinses of an 0.3% solution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are consistent with a recent finding involving the intraoral demineralization test which showed that demineralization is a function of total sugar exposure [Tehrani et al, 1983]. 2 rinses with a 5% solution caused demineralization; 6 rinses were needed with a 1 % solution, 9 rinses with 0.5%, and no demineralization was ob served with 9 rinses of an 0.3% solution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Treatment with 5% sucrose solution resulted in similar mineral loss as in 10 and 20% sucrose treatments and enamel demineralization was observed in dental blocks treated with 5% sucrose solution, in agreement with Tehrani et al [1983]. However, unlike the present work, Tehrani et al [1983] did not compare 5% sucrose solution with higher sucrose concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In a short-term study, using artifi cial biofi lm, Tehrani et al [1983] found that two rinses with 1% sucrose solution did not result in mineral loss, which was, however, observed when 5% sucrose solution was utilized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, previous data from an in situ study have shown a statistically significant increase in mineral loss of enamel slabs exposed to 5% sucrose compared with those exposed to 1% sucrose [27]. The same trend was also observed by a short-term study using artificial biofilm [28]. The differences found between our data and those of Aires et al [27] might be related mainly to the fact that in the latter study sucrose was provided to the in situ formed biofilms in a frequency of 8x/day during 14 days whereas the cariogenic challenge in our study was induced only three times a day during 5 days only.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%