Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces

Hu, Haikun; Li, Chunjie; Li, Fan; Chen, Jianwei; Sun, Jianfeng; Zou, Shujuan; Sandham, Andrew; Xu, Qiang; Riley, Philip; Ye, Qingsong

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005516.pub2

Cited by 17 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The bond strengths obtained via this protocol are usually high, ranging between 10-35 MPa with usually higher values being attained by ceramic than metal brackets (13), but frequently associated with significant remnant adhesive left on enamel, chipping or cracking of enamel at bracket debonding (6,14). The bond strengths of all metal and ceramic subgroups in this study are within the confines of this range.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Resistance of bonded premolars to four artificial ageing models post enamel conditioning with a novel calcium-phosphate paste

Ibrahim

Al-Hasani²,

Thompson

et al. 2020

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 55%

Resistance of bonded premolars to four artificial ageing models post enamel conditioning with a novel calcium-phosphate paste

Ibrahim

Al-Hasani²,

Thompson

et al. 2020

J Clin Exp Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…e adhesive-enamel interface has been well tested as evidenced by numerous articles dedicated to both in vivo and in vitro tests. ese surveys mostly assessed the application of self-etching primer which is still controversial [15][16][17][18][19]. e evaluation of identical adhesive systems and two different orthodontic brackets makes it possible to compare the bond strength between the adhesive and the bracket.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Clinical Comparison of Failure Rates of Metallic and Ceramic Brackets: A Twelve-Month Study

Ogiński

Kawala

Mikulewicz

et al. 2020

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. Clinical comparison of the survival rates between stainless steel and ceramic brackets over a 12-month period. Materials and Methods. The study involved 20 consecutive patients with diagnosed malocclusion that required two-arch fixed appliance treatment. The participants were randomly divided into two 10-member groups. Group 1 was treated with Abzil Agile (3M Unitek) stainless steel brackets; group 2 was treated with Radiance (American Orthodontics) monocrystalline ceramic brackets. All the brackets were bonded by the same operator. Over the next 12 months, all bracket failures were recorded with each appointment. The received data were processed statistically using the Mantel–Cox test, Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox hazard model. Results. A total of 381 brackets were bonded, 195 of which were metallic brackets and 186 were ceramic ones. In the 12-month observation period, there were 14 metal (7.2%) and 2 ceramic bracket (1.1%) failures. The overall failure rate was 4.2% (n = 16). The majority of failures (14 brackets; 87.5%) occurred during the first 6 months of the experiment, 12 (83%) of which were metal brackets and 2 (100%) were ceramic brackets. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the groups (p<0.05). Conclusions. Metal brackets demonstrated significantly higher failure rates than ceramic brackets for both 6- and 12-month observation periods (p<0.05). The 6% difference between the brackets is clinically significant as it corresponds to one additional failure within 12 months.

show abstract

“…However, whether SEPs or conventional etchants are better, and the best SEP, acid, concentration and etching time, remain to be undetermined. 12 Lately, a new self-adhering flowable resin composite, Vertise Flow (Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), has been launched into the dental market. Vertise Flow has been proposed as a self-adhering restorative material.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different bonding techniques on the debonding characteristics of ceramic brackets

Tageldin¹,

Ismail²,

Mowafy³

2015

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:Objective: Objective: Objective: To evaluate and compare shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of ceramic brackets using different bonding techniques. Materials and Methods:Materials and Methods: Materials and Methods: Materials and Methods: Ninety six premolar teeth were randomly divided into six groups: 1) Transbond XT with 5 seconds etch, 2) Transbond XT with 15 seconds etch, 3) Transbond XT with Transbond Plus Self -Etching Primer, 4) Vertise Flow with 5 seconds etch, 5) Vertise Flow with 15 seconds etch, 6) Vertise Flow with Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer. In each group 16 bracketed teeth with Inspire Ice bracket, 8 of which were debonded by universal testing machine to determine the shear bond strength. The other 8 ceramic brackets were removed with plastic debonding plier. All teeth were examined under a stereomicroscope, the adhesive remnant index and bracket fracture were assessed. Results:Results: Results: Results: The mean SBS for group I to VI was (1.78 ± 0.78, 14.5 ± 5, 12.52 ± 3.69, 4.15 ± 2.35, 13.26 ± 4.46, 6.78 ± 3.51,) MPa respectively. Bracket fractures were noted in 10 out of 48 samples after debonding with plier. Groups II and V exhibited the higest SBS and the highest ratio of bracket fracture. Conclusion:Conclusion: Conclusion: Conclusion: Using 15 seconds etching with either Transbond XT or Vertise Flow gave acceptable SBS.Self-etching primer gave lower SBS but within the acceptable clinical range. Decreasing etching time to 5 seconds didn't give clinically acceptable SBS.

show abstract

Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces

Cited by 17 publications

References 53 publications

Resistance of bonded premolars to four artificial ageing models post enamel conditioning with a novel calcium-phosphate paste

Resistance of bonded premolars to four artificial ageing models post enamel conditioning with a novel calcium-phosphate paste

A Clinical Comparison of Failure Rates of Metallic and Ceramic Brackets: A Twelve-Month Study

Effect of different bonding techniques on the debonding characteristics of ceramic brackets

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About