Sex estimation of skeletons is fundamental to many archaeological studies. currently, three approaches are available to estimate sex-osteology, genomics, or proteomics, but little is known about the relative reliability of these methods in applied settings. We present matching osteological, shotgun-genomic, and proteomic data to estimate the sex of 55 individuals, each with an independent radiocarbon date between 2,440 and 100 cal BP, from two ancestral Ohlone sites in Central California. Sex estimation was possible in 100% of this burial sample using proteomics, in 91% using genomics, and in 51% using osteology. Agreement between the methods was high, however conflicts did occur. Genomic sex estimates were 100% consistent with proteomic and osteological estimates when DNA reads were above 100,000 total sequences. However, more than half the samples had DNA read numbers below this threshold, producing high rates of conflict with osteological and proteomic data where nine out of twenty conditional DNA sex estimates conflicted with proteomics. While the DNA signal decreased by an order of magnitude in the older burial samples, there was no decrease in proteomic signal. We conclude that proteomics provides an important complement to osteological and shotgun-genomic sex estimation. Biological sex plays an important role in the human experience, correlating to lifespan, reproduction, and a wide range of other biological factors 1-5. Sex and gender are also fundamental in structuring an array of cultural behaviors, including residence patterns, kinship, economic roles, and identity construction and expression 6-9. How sex interacts with gender and these particular issues is not static and can vary in detail across societies and over time 10-12. It is not surprising that sex is one of the most basic and important measures in bioarchaeological and forensic analyses. Typically, osteological features are used to estimate sex of skeletal remains, and the most widely used marker is the morphology of the os coxae 13-16. However, appropriate markers are not always sufficiently expressed or preserved to estimate sex using morphological criteria 17. A lack of sexually-dimorphic markers is especially acute for skeletons of infants and children who have not undergone puberty. Mortuary practices, such as cremation or secondary burial in charnel houses, can also can impose limitations on the utility of osteological sex estimates 18. The advent of DNA sequencing made it possible to use skeletal remains to estimate the sex of very young individuals; it also expanded sex estimations for fragmentary, pathological, and degraded skeletal materials 19-21. More recently, development of massively parallel DNA sequencing greatly improved genome coverage in archaeological samples 22-25. In addition to providing detailed genetic information, this allows biological sex to be estimated from shotgun sequencing data 25-27. These approaches were an improvement over earlier PCR-based marker