“…One suggestion of an optimal measure for comparative purposes is volume of enamel over the entire tooth (Martin, 1983), which necessitates either the use of destructive procedures such as separating the enamel cap from the underlying dentine surface (e.g., Kraus, 1952;Korenhof, 1960;Nager, 1960;Achermann, 1970;Sakai, 1967;Corruccini, 1987a,b), or noninvasive imaging modalities such as computed tomography (e.g., Conroy, 1991;Schwartz, 1997;Schwartz et al, 1998;Hlusko and Suwa, 2002;Kono, 2004). Linear measurements of tissue thickness (e.g., Macho and Berner, 1993;Schwartz, 2000a,b) may be less ideal representations of total tissue volumes than area measurements and the indices derived from those areas (Martin, 1983;Molnar et al, 1993;Shellis et al, 1998).…”