2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3nr03077f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantioselective disruption of cellulose nanocrystal self-assembly into chiral nematic phases in d-alanine solutions

David Attia,
Orit Mendelson,
Yael Levi-Kalisman
et al.

Abstract: The chiral environment of enantiomerically pure D-Alanine solutions is observed to disrupt and modify the entropy-driven assembly of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) into a chiral nematic mesophase. The effect is specific...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rod spacing (d) among CNCs was calculated from the main peak position (q 0 ) (Table S2, where d = 2π/q 0 ). It is worth noting that, compared to pitch values in the literature (5−25 μm 40,56 ), the cholesteric pitch values in CNCs/TA systems are generally smaller, while the average rod spacing (60 to 42 nm) is relatively larger (50 to 5 nm 57 or 60 to 20 nm 58 in the literature). We have used these values to calculate the twist angle (θ) that one rod has to twist to its neighbor, assuming that θ = 360°× d/p, the rod twist angle (approximately 5.8°) is larger than that in the literature, probably due to the different sources and aspect ratios of CNCs in these studies (Table S3).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The rod spacing (d) among CNCs was calculated from the main peak position (q 0 ) (Table S2, where d = 2π/q 0 ). It is worth noting that, compared to pitch values in the literature (5−25 μm 40,56 ), the cholesteric pitch values in CNCs/TA systems are generally smaller, while the average rod spacing (60 to 42 nm) is relatively larger (50 to 5 nm 57 or 60 to 20 nm 58 in the literature). We have used these values to calculate the twist angle (θ) that one rod has to twist to its neighbor, assuming that θ = 360°× d/p, the rod twist angle (approximately 5.8°) is larger than that in the literature, probably due to the different sources and aspect ratios of CNCs in these studies (Table S3).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%