“…However, in addition to the facile β–H elimination from the Csp 3 –[M] intermediate, the inherent challenge with asymmetric alkene arylalkylation involving the simultaneous incorporation of two distinct natures of Csp 2 and Csp 3 -hydridized carbogenic groups across the double bond lies in the simultaneous control of all aspects of selectivity, including chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity. − While the intramolecular two-component alkene arylalkylation has been widely explored by cyclizative coupling of aryl-tethered alkenes − (Figure a), the development of an enantioselective intermolecular, three-component variant in a regioselective manner remains an unmet challenge. Until recent years, building on the landmark achievements in base-metal catalysis for the utilization of a wide range of Csp 3 -based coupling partners through a 1e-logic process, ,− tremendous advances on three-component asymmetric arylalkylation of alkenes by transition metal, dual electrochemical/nickel, or photoredox/nickel catalysis have been therefore achieved with high regioselectivity via the radical relay strategy. ,− However, in this event, the radical-trapping π-systems were severely restricted to terminal alkenes, thus being limited to the incorporation of alkyl units at the terminal olefinic position (Figure b). In stark contrast to the well-established radical relay strategy, the catalytic enantioselective, three-component arylalkylation of alkenes via stereoselective migratory insertion strategy in an enantio- and regioselective manner has been largely underdeveloped so far (Figure d).…”