2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0sc05734g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantioselective transition metal catalysis directed by chiral cations

Abstract: Enantioselective transition metal catalysis directed by chiral cations is the amalgamation of chiral cation catalysis and organometallic catalysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Notable exceptions, along with other related examples, have been documented in recent reviews. 11,80 Our group has developed an alternative strategy for uniting privileged chiral cations with transition metals to carry out enantioselective C− H bond functionalization. In this approach, a common achiral ligand scaffold is first rendered anionic through the attachment of a sulfonate group, which can ion-pair with a chiral cation.…”
Section: Transition Metal Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notable exceptions, along with other related examples, have been documented in recent reviews. 11,80 Our group has developed an alternative strategy for uniting privileged chiral cations with transition metals to carry out enantioselective C− H bond functionalization. In this approach, a common achiral ligand scaffold is first rendered anionic through the attachment of a sulfonate group, which can ion-pair with a chiral cation.…”
Section: Transition Metal Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are relatively few examples of combining chiral cations with transition metals, since catalytic cycles rarely contain anionic metal intermediates, precluding direct ion-pairing between a catalytically relevant complex and a chiral cation. Notable exceptions, along with other related examples, have been documented in recent reviews. , Our group has developed an alternative strategy for uniting privileged chiral cations with transition metals to carry out enantioselective C–H bond functionalization. In this approach, a common achiral ligand scaffold is first rendered anionic through the attachment of a sulfonate group, which can ion-pair with a chiral cation.…”
Section: Transition Metal Catalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recently, an alternative to the common metal-plus-chiral-ligand approach has emerged in which chiral transition metal catalysts are assembled exclusively from achiral or optically inactive free ligands with the overall chirality being the consequence of a stereogenic metal center. , This review will only discuss chiral catalysts in which the metal constitutes both the reaction center plus a stereogenic center. Metal-templated catalysis, in which the metal has a purely structural role with the catalysis occurring exclusively through the organic ligand sphere, falls outside the scope of this review. Furthermore, not covered are chiral metal complex salts in which the chirality originates from the counterion. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently developed an unconventional approach for the control of enantioselectivity in transition metal catalysis; in comparison to a more traditional strategy in which chirality is embedded within the ligand architecture, ours locates it “off-complex” on a cinchona alkaloid-derived chiral cation, ion-paired with an achiral transition metal complex that has been rendered anionic through the attachment of a sulfonate group (Figure b). Our first proof-of-concept study achieved asymmetric, desymmetrizing C­( sp 2 )–H borylation using iridium catalysis, and we further validated the approach on C­( sp 3 )–H amination, wherein a chiral, ion-paired version of Du Bois’ Rh 2 (esp) 2 catalyst mediated selective nitrenoid C–H insertion at a prochiral methylene . We speculated that our ion-paired Rh “Sulfonesp” catalysts developed for that work might also be capable of discriminating between prochiral alkene faces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%