2015
DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201500073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encapsulating Tin Dioxide@Porous Carbon in Carbon Tubes: A Fiber‐in‐Tube Hierarchical Nanostructure for Superior Capacity and Long‐Life Lithium Storage

Abstract: A novel fiber‐in‐tube hierarchical nanostructure of SnO2@porous carbon in carbon tubes (SnO2@PC/CTs) is creatively designed and synthesized though a carbon coating on scalable electrospun hybrid nanofibers template and a post‐etching technique. This 1D nanoarchitecture consists of double carbon‐buffering matrixes, i.e., the external carbon tubular shell and the internal porous carbon skeleton, which can work synergistically to address the various issues of SnO2 nanoanode operation, such as pulverization, parti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The latter one is believed to be a relatively simple and eco-friendly method to prepare N-doped carbon materials. Polydopamine (PDA), as a nitrogen-rich biomimetic polymer, has been intensively studied as the in situ N-doped carbon precursor for coating Si, [32][33][34] SnO 2 , 35,36 Fe 3 O 4 (ref. 37 and 38) and MnO, 39 which can highly buffer the volume expansion of these high-capacity lithium-storage materials and improve the conductivity of the overall electrode during cycling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The latter one is believed to be a relatively simple and eco-friendly method to prepare N-doped carbon materials. Polydopamine (PDA), as a nitrogen-rich biomimetic polymer, has been intensively studied as the in situ N-doped carbon precursor for coating Si, [32][33][34] SnO 2 , 35,36 Fe 3 O 4 (ref. 37 and 38) and MnO, 39 which can highly buffer the volume expansion of these high-capacity lithium-storage materials and improve the conductivity of the overall electrode during cycling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low cost and stable cycling performance, current commercial lithium ion battery anode materials are almost graphite, which has the theoretical specific capacity of only 372 mA h g −1 and it is difficult to meet the increasing demand of improved safety and high energy/power density . Lately, nanostructured Sn, Si, alloy, and transition metal oxides have been extensively explored as an alternative LIB anode due to their outstanding capacity. However, during the Li alloying–dealloying processes, the anode could suffer a large volume expansion and contraction, resulting in a poor cycling behavior, which is a serious challenge in their large‐scale applications in LIBs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure a–c shows the CV curves of the initial three cycles of the SnO x @PCNFs electrodes at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s –1 . For all three samples, the sharp cathodic peak observed in the first cycle at about 0.8 V (marked by blue circle) is mainly attributed to the decomposition of the electrolyte to form the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer, and this peak disappears from the second cycle. , Another cathodic peak from 0.75 to 0.005 V (marked by the green rectangle) is attributed to the alloying of Li x Sn as well as the intercalation of Li + storage in the PCNFs. ,, In the following anodic sweep, two humps appearing at 0.55 and 1.20 V (marked by the red circle) correspond to the phase transitions from Li–Sn alloy and Li 2 O to SnO x , respectively. ,,, From Figure a to c, it is easily seen that the two electrochemical reaction humps increase in height with the increase of SnO x content in the three samples at the first anodic sweep. However, at the second anodic process, the two humps of SnO x @PCNFs-3 with the highest SnO x content weaken obviously, showing the inferior reversible capability of the phase transitions (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%