“…In this case the number of hemorrhage point, the number of ulceration and average trauma degree was 16.12 6 2.93, 2.75 6 1.39 and 3.25 6 0.43 respectively, while the corresponding values were significantly lower for micelles treated groups at doses of 0.5 mg kg À1 (0, 0, and 0), 1.5 mg kg À1 (0.25 6 0.43, 0 and 0.25 6 0.43), and 4.5 mg kg À1 (0.50 6 0.71, 0 and 0.38 6 0.48). This result further suggests that intra-articular injection of IND-loaded micelles could alleviate the significant gastrointestinal stimulation that frequently observed for oral administration and subcutaneous injection in abdomen as well, as reported by Soehngen et al 45 Additionally, in combination with our previous result based on polyphosphazenes with PNIPAAm and ethyl tryptophan (EtTrp) as substitutes, 26 we can conclude that the hydrophobic group has no significant effect on the in vivo therapeutic efficacy. However, detailed in vivo evaluation still needs to be carried out to address the effect of copolymer composition on the local tissue reaction, such as stimulation, inflammation, toxicity, and so forth.…”