1988
DOI: 10.1002/art.1780310314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encapsulation of indomethacin in liposomes provides protection against both gastric and intestinal ulceration when orally administered to rats

Abstract: Encapsulation of indomethacin into egg phosphatidylcholine (EPC) monophasic vesicles (MPV) or into stable plurilamellar vesicles (SPLV) before oral administration to rats substantially reduced or eliminated the gastric and intestinal ulceration normally associated with ingestion of this drug. Ulcers were assessed by the 4-hour single-dose gastric ulceration model and the 4-or 14-day repeated-dose intestinal ulceration model, using microscopic/planimetric quantitation. Oral dosages of up to 10 mg/kg of indomet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case the number of hemorrhage point, the number of ulceration and average trauma degree was 16.12 ± 2.93, 2.75 ± 1.39 and 3.25 ± 0.43 respectively, while the corresponding values were significantly lower for micelles treated groups at doses of 0.5 mg kg −1 (0, 0, and 0), 1.5 mg kg −1 (0.25 ± 0.43, 0 and 0.25 ± 0.43), and 4.5 mg kg −1 (0.50 ± 0.71, 0 and 0.38 ± 0.48). This result further suggests that intra‐articular injection of IND‐loaded micelles could alleviate the significant gastrointestinal stimulation that frequently observed for oral administration and subcutaneous injection in abdomen as well, as reported by Soehngen et al45…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this case the number of hemorrhage point, the number of ulceration and average trauma degree was 16.12 ± 2.93, 2.75 ± 1.39 and 3.25 ± 0.43 respectively, while the corresponding values were significantly lower for micelles treated groups at doses of 0.5 mg kg −1 (0, 0, and 0), 1.5 mg kg −1 (0.25 ± 0.43, 0 and 0.25 ± 0.43), and 4.5 mg kg −1 (0.50 ± 0.71, 0 and 0.38 ± 0.48). This result further suggests that intra‐articular injection of IND‐loaded micelles could alleviate the significant gastrointestinal stimulation that frequently observed for oral administration and subcutaneous injection in abdomen as well, as reported by Soehngen et al45…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In this case the number of hemorrhage point, the number of ulceration and average trauma degree was 16.12 6 2.93, 2.75 6 1.39 and 3.25 6 0.43 respectively, while the corresponding values were significantly lower for micelles treated groups at doses of 0.5 mg kg À1 (0, 0, and 0), 1.5 mg kg À1 (0.25 6 0.43, 0 and 0.25 6 0.43), and 4.5 mg kg À1 (0.50 6 0.71, 0 and 0.38 6 0.48). This result further suggests that intra-articular injection of IND-loaded micelles could alleviate the significant gastrointestinal stimulation that frequently observed for oral administration and subcutaneous injection in abdomen as well, as reported by Soehngen et al 45 Additionally, in combination with our previous result based on polyphosphazenes with PNIPAAm and ethyl tryptophan (EtTrp) as substitutes, 26 we can conclude that the hydrophobic group has no significant effect on the in vivo therapeutic efficacy. However, detailed in vivo evaluation still needs to be carried out to address the effect of copolymer composition on the local tissue reaction, such as stimulation, inflammation, toxicity, and so forth.…”
Section: Pharmacodynamic Studysupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Various publications also show for orally administered indomethacin in a DPPC/ tripalmitine microemulsion (53) or indomethacin in liposomes (EPC/ DPPC; Soehngen (89)) that the use of phospholipids reduces the gastrointestinal side effects.…”
Section: Reduction Of Side Effectsmentioning
confidence: 97%