2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2011.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encapsulation of probiotic Bifidobacterium longum BIOMA 5920 with alginate–human-like collagen and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pH of control samples reached 4.02 at the end of 30 days storage and the final pH of mayonnaise sauce samples with free probiotics decreased same as control. This may be due to low survival of free probiotics in lower pH (4.6), thus there were no significant differences between free and control samples (Collins, 1985;Lock and Board, 1995;Khalil and Mansour, 1998;Mokarram et al, 2009;Nazzaro et al, 2009;Chávarri et al, 2010;Brinques and Ayub, 2011;Su et al, 2011). The pH of samples containing encapsulated cells of L. casei and B. bifidum attained 4.02 and 4.01, respectively.…”
Section: Ph Changes During Mayonnaise Sauce Storagementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pH of control samples reached 4.02 at the end of 30 days storage and the final pH of mayonnaise sauce samples with free probiotics decreased same as control. This may be due to low survival of free probiotics in lower pH (4.6), thus there were no significant differences between free and control samples (Collins, 1985;Lock and Board, 1995;Khalil and Mansour, 1998;Mokarram et al, 2009;Nazzaro et al, 2009;Chávarri et al, 2010;Brinques and Ayub, 2011;Su et al, 2011). The pH of samples containing encapsulated cells of L. casei and B. bifidum attained 4.02 and 4.01, respectively.…”
Section: Ph Changes During Mayonnaise Sauce Storagementioning
confidence: 94%
“…A limiting factor in survival of probiotic bacteria has been reported as low pH (3.6 to 4.6) of mayonnaise sauce owing to the concentration of acetic acid (Radford and Board, 1993;Khalil and Mansour, 1998). It has been proven that microencapsulated probiotics survive better in acid conditions (Khalil and Mansour, 1998;Kebary and Hussein, 1999;Mokarram et al, 2009;Nazzaro et al, 2009;Chávarri et al, 2010;Brinques and Ayub, 2011;Su et al, 2011). Alginate microcapsules can be prepared by emulsion and extrusion techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The encapsulation technologies depend on the capsule material, particle size, and bacterial strain (Burgain et al, 2011). It has been reported that various probiotics encapsulation technologies improve the viability of bacteria during exposure to simulated gastro-intestinal conditions such as alginate-coated gelatin microspheres (Annan et al, 2008), alginate-human-like collagen (Su et al, 2011) and in alginate gel microbeads (Sohail et al, 2011). Alginate is a representative encapsulating material and extensively used, but they are sensitive to the acidic environment and very difficult to scale up (Mortazavian et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, many researchers reported that there is poor survival of probiotic bacteria in products containing free probiotic cells (De Vos et al, 2010). Various technologies of encapsulation such as emulsification, spray drying, spray cooling, and freeze drying have been developed for protection live cells in the food industry (De Vos et al, 2010;Burgain et al, 2011), and it has been reported these technologies of encapsulation improved the viability of probiotic bacteria in the GI tract (Krasaekoopt et al, 2003;Picot and Lacroix, 2004;Sohail et al, 2011;Su et al, 2011;Saarela et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also shown in Figure 3(B) that due to freeze drying, slight disruption of the spherical structure occurred, and the agglomerated FD microcapsules were observed. It can be explained by the possible existence of residual oil droplets on the formed microcapsules (Su et al, 2011). In microencapsulation technology, porosity of wall material is an important factor for the preservation and survival of encapsulated bioactive materials (Allan-Wojtas et al, 2008).…”
Section: Morphological Studies and Diameter Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%