1933
DOI: 10.2307/4580968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encephalitis: Studies on Experimental Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1934
1934
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence that the virus of St. Louis encephalitis may multiply outside the central nervous system of mice, was supplied by Webster and Clow (5) for the spleen and by Lennette and Smith for the testicles (10). In human beings, the virus of St. Louis encephalitis has been recovered only from the brain; there is no record of tests on other tissues, although negative results have been reported for blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and nasal washings (11,12). Sulkin, Harford, and Bronfenbrenner (13), however, believed that nasopharyngeal washings from human cases might have contained some virus because some of their inoculated mice exhibited a certain amount of immunity.…”
Section: Virus 0~' St Louis Encephalitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence that the virus of St. Louis encephalitis may multiply outside the central nervous system of mice, was supplied by Webster and Clow (5) for the spleen and by Lennette and Smith for the testicles (10). In human beings, the virus of St. Louis encephalitis has been recovered only from the brain; there is no record of tests on other tissues, although negative results have been reported for blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and nasal washings (11,12). Sulkin, Harford, and Bronfenbrenner (13), however, believed that nasopharyngeal washings from human cases might have contained some virus because some of their inoculated mice exhibited a certain amount of immunity.…”
Section: Virus 0~' St Louis Encephalitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Received for publication, July 1, 1935) Experiments on the probable virus nature of the encephalitis prevalent in St. Louis during the summer of 1933 have been reported b y Muckenfuss, Armstrong, and McCordock (1), and by Webster and Fite (2,3). The former workers obtained a virus by inoculating brain tissue from fatal cases into Macacus rhesus monkeys; the latter recovered a similar virus by inoculating the brain tissue into special mice.…”
Section: (From the Laboratories Of The Rockefeller Institute For Medimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rift Valley fever virus was shown capable of infecting monkeys by a number of different inoculation routes (83). Muckenfuss et al (251) demonstrated the viral etiology of St. Louis encephalitis (SLE) by producing the disease in monkeys. The virus of lymphocytic choriomeningitis (LCM) was recovered from monkeys as a result of studies with SLE (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%