Enclave-Reinforced Inequality during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from University Campus Lockdowns in Wuhan, China

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted urban life and created spatial and social inequalities in cities. The impacts of lifting full lockdown restrictions once fast-spreading and community-acquired infection waves were under control are still not fully understood. This study aims to explore spatial inequality reinforced in the intervals between the waves of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Enclave-reinforced inequality resulting from enclave-based lockdown policies in Chinese cities was investigated through an analysis of the impacts of university campus enclave closures on the accessibility and crowdedness of urban green spaces. Using a modified two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) and inversed 2SFCA (i2SFCA) method, accessibility and crowdedness were calculated and compared under two different scenarios. Additionally, the Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Theil index were used to measure and compare intra-city global and local inequalities under each scenario. The results indicate that the lockdown of university campus enclaves decreased the supply of urban green spaces. Campus closures not only exacerbated the unequal distribution of urban green space, but also reduced the inequality of crowdedness in urban parks due to increased crowdedness in parks near the closed enclaves. Moreover, both accessibility and crowdedness worsened when the calculations were weighted for population size and the total supply of green space. Enclave-based lockdown in cities reinforced spatial inequality, and it is highly complex and has multidimensional impacts on urban inequalities and environmental injustice which should be considered by urban planners and decision-makers hoping to create healthy, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable cities in the “new normal” of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Food Environment Inequalities and Moderating Effects of Obesity on Their Relationships with COVID-19 in Chicago

“…Inequitable responses to and consequences of COVID-19 have been observed in terms of income, age, race, and other socioeconomic factors [31][32][33], which might reinforce existing structural inequalities in human social and economic systems [34,35]. Additionally, COVID-19 restriction policies, such as lockdowns and social distancing [36], have raised new inequalities and injustices, due to inequitable living, working, and environmental conditions and resulting unequal access to urban services and well-being resources, such as public transport, public spaces, and digital infrastructure among different groups of the population [37][38][39][40][41][42].…”

Multi-Impacts of Spatial Self-Policing during COVID-19: Evidence from a Chinese University

“…Negative Impacts of Campus Self-Policing on University Students 2.3.1. Impacts on the Social Aspects Sun et al [29] found that campus lockdown by self-policing minimized students' social contacts, whose academic network, based on academic conferences, lectures, competitions, exhibitions, etc., was largely blocked. They failed to trigger multidiscipline innovation with other universities and corporations at home and abroad because academic mobility was severely restricted [30].…”

A Spatial Adaptation Strategy for Safe Campus Open Spaces during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Korea University

“…Social distancing policies often lead to a lack of social interaction among all university members, but students are more vulnerable to stress due to social isolation [ 26 ]. Furthermore, the closures of the OSoC affect not only university members but also the surrounding community, as they decrease the supply of open spaces in cities, which could lead to the unequal distribution of open spaces [ 27 ]. A model by Brigham and Women’s Hospital showed that failure to implement a proper mitigation plan on campuses could put 16% of faculty members at risk of getting the infection per semester, and this number could increase to 15 times higher for students [ 28 ].…”