2023
DOI: 10.31743/lingbaw.17023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enclisis, mesoclisis and inflection in Italo-Romance varieties: A minimalist analysis

Leonardo M. Savoia,
Benedetta Baldi

Abstract: This contribution addresses a central theme in morphological analysis, namely the relationship between clitics and inflectional elements. Important contributions on the point are due to Anderson (1992) and Marantz (1988), who, in different ways, connect clitics and affixes. We will propose a solution based on the idea that clitics are part of the inflectional arrangement of the verbal head. Specifically, we will investigate two types of data coming from some Romance varieties in which enclisis and mesoclisis p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that enclitic elements are part of the inflectional structure of the word, within which they are inserted on the basis of selection constraints of the type in (99c) (for this approach to enclisis, cf. Savoia and Baldi 2023). We note that the inflectional mark that is introduced, here -u, does not correspond to the class of the noun, in (99) the class III, nor to the inflectional system of the possessive.…”
Section: The Domain Of the Dpmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We assume that enclitic elements are part of the inflectional structure of the word, within which they are inserted on the basis of selection constraints of the type in (99c) (for this approach to enclisis, cf. Savoia and Baldi 2023). We note that the inflectional mark that is introduced, here -u, does not correspond to the class of the noun, in (99) the class III, nor to the inflectional system of the possessive.…”
Section: The Domain Of the Dpmentioning
confidence: 88%