2009
DOI: 10.1080/15332740903117701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoded Archival Description as a Halfway Technology

Abstract: In the mid 1990s, Encoded Archival Description (EAD) appeared as a revolutionary technology for publishing archival finding aids on the Web. The author explores whether or not, given the advent of Web 2.0, the archival community should abandon EAD and look for something to replace it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archival metadata standards assist in guaranteeing that metadata are consistent and correct, thereby facilitating archive resource search and retrieval (Gueguen et al , 2013). Additionally, they promote the integration of metadata from numerous sources and the establishment of semantic links between archived materials and other relevant entities, such as people, organisations and events (Dow, 2009; Pacheco et al , 2023). In general, archival metadata standards aim to describe consistent rules for four object categories: archival resources, archival institutions, archival activities and persons or groups related to archival resources (Llanes-Padrón and Pastor-Sánchez, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archival metadata standards assist in guaranteeing that metadata are consistent and correct, thereby facilitating archive resource search and retrieval (Gueguen et al , 2013). Additionally, they promote the integration of metadata from numerous sources and the establishment of semantic links between archived materials and other relevant entities, such as people, organisations and events (Dow, 2009; Pacheco et al , 2023). In general, archival metadata standards aim to describe consistent rules for four object categories: archival resources, archival institutions, archival activities and persons or groups related to archival resources (Llanes-Padrón and Pastor-Sánchez, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it is unfair, as many authors did, to heap on EAD criticism that actually pertains to the deficiencies of the archival milieu at large. For instance, the subjective difficulty in appropriating EAD was and still is largely due to the lack of training (or interest) from archivists into computer matters (Shaw, 2001;Yaco, 2008;Dow, 2009). Lack of funding for the purchase of computers, software, training sessions, and other such spendings for the implementation of EAD cannot be seriously attributed to EAD itself either: technology always comes at a cost.…”
Section: Ddi and Eadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reasons have been given for this, including, for instance, the flexibility of the EAD architecture, which allows similar concepts to be recorded in multiple ways (Shaw 2009, p. 123). Others, such as Dow (2009), argue that EAD is inherently more 'document-centric' (modelled on the requirements of encoding the features of the textual document which forms the traditional printed finding aid) than 'data-centric' (modelled on atomistic data components at multiple levels of granularity); this makes interoperability, particularly its potential for detailed federated searching, harder to achieve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%