2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04076.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoded errors: mutations and rearrangements mediated by misalignment at repetitive DNA sequences

Abstract: SummaryMutations and rearrangements that occur by misalignment during DNA replication are frequent sources of genetic variation in bacteria. Dislocations between a replicating strand and its template at repetitive DNA sequences underlie the mechanism of these genetic events. Such misalignments can be transient or stable and can involve intramolecular or intermolecular DNA mispairing, even pairing across a replication fork. Paradoxically, these replication 'slippage' events both create and destroy repetitive se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
220
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(112 reference statements)
10
220
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Events of the type proposed here have been described by others in a variety of organisms (Persky and Lovett 2008). After replication fork stalling, single strands of nascent DNA are released and contribute to chromosome rearrangement (Lovett 2004). Short (imperfect) palindromic sequences are frequent (Stern et al 1984;Bachellier et al 1999;Vasconcelos et al 2000) and can form ''snap-back'' structures in single-stranded DNA (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Events of the type proposed here have been described by others in a variety of organisms (Persky and Lovett 2008). After replication fork stalling, single strands of nascent DNA are released and contribute to chromosome rearrangement (Lovett 2004). Short (imperfect) palindromic sequences are frequent (Stern et al 1984;Bachellier et al 1999;Vasconcelos et al 2000) and can form ''snap-back'' structures in single-stranded DNA (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This synthesis must open the template duplex and is likely to be prone to template switching, which has been observed in many situations, especially for the PolA repair polymerase (Ross et al 1979;Ahmed and Podemski 1998;Pinder et al 1998;Lovett 2004;Lee et al 2007). Strand extension after this template switch generates a branched structure that can be resolved either by chromosome replication or by repair of the three-way junction to yield a symmetrical inversion duplication (see nick indicated in Figure 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data suggest that DNA damage response proteins help to maintain genome stability by coordinating proper HR-mediated repair of spontaneous DSBs, some of which are likely to occur as a consequence of unusual nucleic acid structures that form during DNA replication (Bacolla et al 2004;Lovett 2004). Defects in DNA damage response proteins such as ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, MRE11, and NBS1 result in familial cancer syndromes and confer GCRs such as inversions, translocations, or large deletions suggestive of DSB repair defects (Venkitaraman 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 9 out of 19 mutations are frameshift: seven are small insertions or deletions (o5 bp), one is a deletion of 12 bp (c.1127_1131del), and one is a duplication of 12 bp (c.1166_1178dup) (Table 1). Generally, frameshift muta- tions occur in stretches of repetitive DNA nucleotide runs that probably cause slippage errors of the DNA polymerase, at the replication fork [Lovett, 2004;Schmidt et al, 2005]. IKBKG exon 10 is particularly rich in mononucleotide tracts of cytosines (Fig.…”
Section: Ikbkg Mutational Hotspot In ''C N '' Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%