2022
DOI: 10.1080/13682199.2022.2163531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoder–decoder semantic segmentation models for pressure wound images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model employs the VGG16 network [12] for extracting and comparing texture features of images. This choice is based on the superior retention of texture details in the first convolutional layer of the VGG network [13], which utilizes large kernels and strides to compress input, compared to architectures such as AlexNet [14] and GoogLeNet [15]. The research modifies the texture loss calculation scheme, drawing inspiration from the method proposed by Jiang et al [16].…”
Section: Training Of the Reference Image Generation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model employs the VGG16 network [12] for extracting and comparing texture features of images. This choice is based on the superior retention of texture details in the first convolutional layer of the VGG network [13], which utilizes large kernels and strides to compress input, compared to architectures such as AlexNet [14] and GoogLeNet [15]. The research modifies the texture loss calculation scheme, drawing inspiration from the method proposed by Jiang et al [16].…”
Section: Training Of the Reference Image Generation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%