1976
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding-imagery specificity in alcohol state-dependent learning.

Abstract: A free-recall procedure demonstrated state-dependent learning using alcohol. Tests of long-term memory showed that both high-and low-imagery words were less likely to be recalled if stored while intoxicated rather than under sober conditions. However, information encoded and stored while intoxicated was more effectively retrieved when later tests of recall were performed while intoxicated, as compared to recall accomplished in the sober state. This dissociative recall effect was far more robust with low-imager… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in situations in which retrieval is tested in the absence of explicit list or copy cues, specifically, the tasks of free recall (Bustamante, Jordan, Vila, Gonzalez, & Insua, 1970, Cases 05 and 06;Bustamante, Rossello, Jordan, Pradere, & Insua, 1968, Cases 03 and 04;Darley et al, 1974, Case 12;Miller et aI., 1978, Experiment 2, Case 32; R. C. Petersen, 1977, Cases 3941;Weingartner, 1978 (Goodwin et aI., 1969, Case 27;Hill et al, 1973, Cases 28 and 29;Stillman et al, 1974, Case 47;Weingartner, Eich, & Allen, 1973, Case 54), it is convenient to assume that information necessary for retrieval is carried by invisible cues:…”
Section: Sources Of the Unpredictability Of State-dependent Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in situations in which retrieval is tested in the absence of explicit list or copy cues, specifically, the tasks of free recall (Bustamante, Jordan, Vila, Gonzalez, & Insua, 1970, Cases 05 and 06;Bustamante, Rossello, Jordan, Pradere, & Insua, 1968, Cases 03 and 04;Darley et al, 1974, Case 12;Miller et aI., 1978, Experiment 2, Case 32; R. C. Petersen, 1977, Cases 3941;Weingartner, 1978 (Goodwin et aI., 1969, Case 27;Hill et al, 1973, Cases 28 and 29;Stillman et al, 1974, Case 47;Weingartner, Eich, & Allen, 1973, Case 54), it is convenient to assume that information necessary for retrieval is carried by invisible cues:…”
Section: Sources Of the Unpredictability Of State-dependent Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of alcohol on human information processing have been well studied (e.g., Jones, 1973;Parker et al, /976;Ryback, 1971;Storm and Caird, 1967;Tharp et al, 1974), and while some of the evidence regarding its capacity to produce statedependency is equivocal (e.g., Goodwin et al, /974;Jones, ~973;Parker et al, 1976), the majority of the data appear to indicate that alcohol does produce state-dependent learning in man (e.g., Goodwin et al, 1969;Storm and Caird, 1967;Weingartner et al, 1976;Weingartner and Faillace, 1971). In a comprehensive study of alcohol's amnestic properties, Jones (1973) concluded that immediate, short-term, and long-term memory are all influenced by alcohol ingestion, but that short-term memory seems to be particularly susceptible to disruption, especially on the ascending limb of the blood alcohol curve.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The less cues are associated with items to be remembered, the more likely alcohol will interfere with recall performance [14,18]. The very fact that images about typical dysphoric (affective) states are not associ ated with specific spatiotemporal cues is likely to make these images more vulnerable to amnestic effects of alcohol.…”
Section: Cognitive Appraisal O F Affective Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of memory for verbal materials demonstrate that contextual factors (cueing) can be critical in determining whether alco hol interferes with recall performance [14,18]. The less cues are associated with items to be remembered, the more likely alcohol will interfere with recall performance [14,18].…”
Section: Cognitive Appraisal O F Affective Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation