2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding pairwise Hamming distances of Local Binary Patterns for visual smoke recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the proposed industrial smoke detection method with other LBP variant methods. These methods include PCLBP and scale space pairwise comparing local binary pattern (SPCLBP) method in [7], the texture feature extraction method based on LBP and LBPV image pyramid in the literature [8], the method of extracting texture features in multiple colour channels combined with LBP and grey level co‐occurrence matrix in the literature [12], and the method of LBP and LBPV which work independently. Owing to the different sizes of the sub‐images and the existence of zero pixels in the sub‐images, the extracted texture feature vectors are normalised according to the method shown in (12).…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compared the proposed industrial smoke detection method with other LBP variant methods. These methods include PCLBP and scale space pairwise comparing local binary pattern (SPCLBP) method in [7], the texture feature extraction method based on LBP and LBPV image pyramid in the literature [8], the method of extracting texture features in multiple colour channels combined with LBP and grey level co‐occurrence matrix in the literature [12], and the method of LBP and LBPV which work independently. Owing to the different sizes of the sub‐images and the existence of zero pixels in the sub‐images, the extracted texture feature vectors are normalised according to the method shown in (12).…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, static functions are more reliable and widely used than dynamic functions. Therefore, most visual smoke detections identify smoke areas in a single image by extracting static features [7]. Smoke areas that take slow changes or even stay static usually will form when the smoke is spreading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is difficult to accurately detect the appearance of mentioned regions from images due to large variations of color intensities and texture. Although, many research works confirmed that texture features play a very important role in smoke and fire detection [ 3 , 4 ]. A wide recent work demonstrated that the multi-scale based techniques play an important role in smoke and texture classification [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it can acquire higher stability and recognition rate under complex illumination condition. Some classical local feature extraction algorithms mainly include Local Graphic Structure (LGS) [13], Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) [14], Local Phase Quantization (LPQ) [15], Local Derivative Pattern (LDP) [16], weighted Local Gabor (LG) [17], Local Gabor Binary Pattern (LGBP) [18], Local Differential Binary (LDB) [19], Local Linear Directional Pattern (LLDP) [20], Local Binary Pattern (LBP) [21], [22], Local Ternary Pattern (LTP) [23], Weber Local Descriptor (WLD) [24], local adapted ternary pattern (LATP) [23], [25], and centrosymmetric LTP with adaptive threshold (CS-LTPAT) [26] and more [27]- [38]. In fact, human perceptions of images depends not only on the absolute stimulus intensity, but also on the relative stimulus strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%