2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding strategy accounts for individual differences in change detection measures of VSTM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
83
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
16
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of encoding mechanisms in determining ASTM capacity is also suggested by the relationship between individual differences in behavioral performance and the specificity with which frequencies were encoded. These results accord with a recent behavioral study that found performance to be determined by attentional selection during the encoding phase (31) and a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data from five different visual short-term memory studies (17) showing that performance correlates with activity in several parietal and frontal regions during the encoding but not the maintenance phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of encoding mechanisms in determining ASTM capacity is also suggested by the relationship between individual differences in behavioral performance and the specificity with which frequencies were encoded. These results accord with a recent behavioral study that found performance to be determined by attentional selection during the encoding phase (31) and a meta-analysis of neuroimaging data from five different visual short-term memory studies (17) showing that performance correlates with activity in several parietal and frontal regions during the encoding but not the maintenance phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is possible that how information is encoded into short-term memory determines performance in change detection tasks (17). Therefore, we asked whether the specificity with which auditory information was encoded predicted individual memory capacity.…”
Section: Suppression Of Sensory Regions During the Maintenance Of Audmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the results here suggest that the ability to elevate visual attention (N2pc) and memory access (SPCN) processes in rPPC may be an important step to explaining individual differences in VSTM performance. Indeed, the tDCS-induced improvement here is most likely attentional rather than VSTM-specific (Desimone and Duncan, 1995;Desimone, 1996;Awh et al, 2000Awh et al, , 2006Awh and Jonides, 2001;Woodman et al, 2007;Cusack et al, 2009;Berryhill et al, 2011;Linke et al, 2011;Gladwin et al, 2012), as the functional roles of PPC have been well established in updating spatial mapping (Morris et al, 2007;Prime et al, 2008), directing attention to salient stimuli (Nobre, 2001;Rushworth and Taylor, 2006;Chao et al, 2011), binding features (Friedman-Hill et al, 1995;Ellison et al, 2007), monitoring temporal patterns (Coull and Nobre, 1998), deploying top-down attentional bias (Kastner and Ungerleider, 2001;Pessoa and Ungerleider, 2004), and VSTM maintenance Marois, 2004, 2005;Vogel and Machizawa, 2004;Tseng et al, 2010) and retrieval (Olson and Berryhill, 2009;Eimer and Kiss, 2010;Berryhill, 2012). Thus, an attentional boost, whether externally via tDCS or internally by other means (Tseng and Bridgeman, 2011) will indeed predict an improvement in VSTM performance, and is very compatible with previous ERP findings on VSTM (Vogel and Machizawa, 2004;McCollough et al, 2007) and change detection (Pourtois et al, 2006).…”
Section: An Attentional Account Of the Effects Of Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Adults with better metacognition might therefore be able to adopt better strategies to adapt to changes in VSTM through the lifespan. For example, a strategy that may be helpful, and used especially by participants of higher fluid intelligence, is to attend to only a subset of items when presented with more than can be remembered (Cusack et al, 2009;Linke et al, 2011;Atkinson et al, 2017). Conversely, it may sometimes be beneficial to attend to the configuration of all items in the display, to the extent that these provide context, as described above, that helps to anchor memories of individual items (Bengson and Luck, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palva et al, 2010;Mitchell and Cusack, 2011;Honkanen et al, 2015;Siebenhuhner et al, 2016), and fMRI (e.g. Todd and Marois, 2005;McNab and Klingberg, 2008;Linke et al, 2011;Stevens et al, 2012;Ester et al, 2013;Vicente-Grabovetsky et al, 2014;Galeano Weber et al, 2016;Veldsman et al, 2017), with some differences reported across age groups (for a review see Sander et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%