“…Nevertheless, the results here suggest that the ability to elevate visual attention (N2pc) and memory access (SPCN) processes in rPPC may be an important step to explaining individual differences in VSTM performance. Indeed, the tDCS-induced improvement here is most likely attentional rather than VSTM-specific (Desimone and Duncan, 1995;Desimone, 1996;Awh et al, 2000Awh et al, , 2006Awh and Jonides, 2001;Woodman et al, 2007;Cusack et al, 2009;Berryhill et al, 2011;Linke et al, 2011;Gladwin et al, 2012), as the functional roles of PPC have been well established in updating spatial mapping (Morris et al, 2007;Prime et al, 2008), directing attention to salient stimuli (Nobre, 2001;Rushworth and Taylor, 2006;Chao et al, 2011), binding features (Friedman-Hill et al, 1995;Ellison et al, 2007), monitoring temporal patterns (Coull and Nobre, 1998), deploying top-down attentional bias (Kastner and Ungerleider, 2001;Pessoa and Ungerleider, 2004), and VSTM maintenance Marois, 2004, 2005;Vogel and Machizawa, 2004;Tseng et al, 2010) and retrieval (Olson and Berryhill, 2009;Eimer and Kiss, 2010;Berryhill, 2012). Thus, an attentional boost, whether externally via tDCS or internally by other means (Tseng and Bridgeman, 2011) will indeed predict an improvement in VSTM performance, and is very compatible with previous ERP findings on VSTM (Vogel and Machizawa, 2004;McCollough et al, 2007) and change detection (Pourtois et al, 2006).…”