2005
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00910.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encoding the Timing of Inhibitory Inputs

Abstract: . Many neuronal systems represent information by the timing of individual spikes, and it is generally assumed that spike timing predominantly encodes excitatory inputs. We show here that the timing of inhibition can also be explicitly encoded in spike times using time-dependent and voltage-dependent properties of a rapidly inactivating potassium channel (I KIF ). In vitro recordings in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus show that the effects of inhibition on spike timing can long outlast the duration of the inhibitor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibitory circuitry may play a role in maintaining/enhancing synchronization to SAM tones (Frisina et al, 1994;Rhode and Greenberg, 1994;Zhao and Liang, 1995;Young, 1998;Backoff et al, 1999;Krishna and Semple, 2000;Hancock and Voigt, 2002b;Joris et al, 2004;Kanold and Manis, 2005;Street and Manis, 2007). The present findings from aged DCN output neurons resemble what is seen when inhibitory neurotransmission is blocked during temporal processing paradigms in CN and IC (Koch and Grothe, 1998;Backoff et al, 1999;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inhibitory circuitry may play a role in maintaining/enhancing synchronization to SAM tones (Frisina et al, 1994;Rhode and Greenberg, 1994;Zhao and Liang, 1995;Young, 1998;Backoff et al, 1999;Krishna and Semple, 2000;Hancock and Voigt, 2002b;Joris et al, 2004;Kanold and Manis, 2005;Street and Manis, 2007). The present findings from aged DCN output neurons resemble what is seen when inhibitory neurotransmission is blocked during temporal processing paradigms in CN and IC (Koch and Grothe, 1998;Backoff et al, 1999;.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…At all temporal modulation depths, and at either age, buildup and pauser-buildup units have higher peak modulation sync functions than units showing widechopper temporal responses at all temporal modulation depths, and at either age. Thus the agerelated shift toward wide-chopper response types, a temporal response type with higher firing rates and a decreased ability to synchronize to a SAM envelop could explain the present findings and is consistent with a loss of glycinergic inhibition.Inhibitory circuitry may play a role in maintaining/enhancing synchronization to SAM tones (Frisina et al, 1994;Rhode and Greenberg, 1994;Zhao and Liang, 1995;Young, 1998;Backoff et al, 1999;Krishna and Semple, 2000;Hancock and Voigt, 2002b;Joris et al, 2004;Kanold and Manis, 2005;Street and Manis, 2007). The present findings from aged DCN output neurons resemble what is seen when inhibitory neurotransmission is blocked during temporal processing paradigms in CN and IC (Koch and Grothe, 1998;Backoff et al, 1999;.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I A is activated by hyperpolarization and subsequently opposes any membrane depolarization, resulting in a delay to reach firing threshold. In cells expressing I A , the relationship between latency and membrane voltage has been shown to be monotonic, such that greater hyperpolarization causes longer delays to first spike (Shibata et al, 2000;Kanold and Manis, 2005). First-spike latency has been studied in many sensory systems in which the magnitude of a sensory input can be more effectively encoded by action potential timing than through changes in spike frequency (Thorpe et al, 1996;Heil, 2004;Johansson and Birznieks, 2004;VanRullen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these channels may play a role in synaptic plasticity, where activity-dependent signaling can alter the inherent excitability of target neurons. Changes in auditory nerve activity following deafness have been shown to induce changes in excitability and response properties in the cochlear nucleus (Francis and Manis, 2000;Kaltenbach and Afman, 2000;Kanold and Manis, 2005;Wang and Manis, 2005) and inferior colliculus (Bledsoe et al, 1995(Bledsoe et al, , 1997Mossop et al, 2000;Salvi et al, 2000;Syka and Rybalko, 2000;Vale and Sanes, 2002;Vale et al, 2004) (for reviews Moller, 2005;Syka, 2002). While the acoustic environment has been shown to influence auditory brain stem responses through modulation of voltage-gated potassium channels, this is achieved largely through phosphorylation rather than chronic alterations in gene expression (Chambard and Ashmore, 2005;Kaczmarek et al, 2005;Macica et al, 2003;Song et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%