2011 International Conference on Computational Problem-Solving (ICCP) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccps.2011.6089802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encounter-based routing in delay tolerant networks

Abstract: Delay tolerant networks are intermittently connected. In this paper, we propose a DTN routing scheme EBR. The scheme is based on the idea of exploiting inter-contact time between mobile nodes to predict the number of nodes with no copy a node will encounter within the expected delay. In EBR, every node with message copies dynamically chooses the number of copies by itself. We evaluate the performance of EBR through various simulations. Simulation results show that EBR has good performance with low overhead in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It determines sparseness and denseness for given time interval. If the network is dense routing engine uses an encounter based forwarding technique [9], else, it invokes multi period based Spray and Wait [10]. Thus, AR toggles between forwarding and replication technique based on network condition per time window.…”
Section: Adaptive Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It determines sparseness and denseness for given time interval. If the network is dense routing engine uses an encounter based forwarding technique [9], else, it invokes multi period based Spray and Wait [10]. Thus, AR toggles between forwarding and replication technique based on network condition per time window.…”
Section: Adaptive Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable number of social-aware or social-based routing protocols for DTNs, hereinafter called social routing protocols, that use centrality 3 metrics have been proposed. If the most common centrality metrics are considered, these protocols can be grouped as follows: degree centrality [16][17][18][19], closeness centrality [20,21] and betweenness centrality [18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Among these metrics, betweenness centrality has shown its relevance to problems such as identifying important nodes that control flows of information between separate parts of a network, and identifying casual nodes to influence other entities behavior (e.g., genes in genomics or customers in marketing studies) [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binary spray and wait [4] initially starts with some number of copies and any node that has more than one copy of message and encounters another node with no copies, then it hands over to another node half copies and keeps half copies itself, when it is left with only one copy, then it switches to direct transmission. Encounter based routing (EBR) [5] route decisions on the base of encounter rate of nodes, inclination to message transferred with nodes that have higher encounter rates. Encounter Value (EV) represents the node's past rate of encounters as an exponentially weighted moving average.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SimBet is social based routing protocol, which use the concept of ego networks where nodes are not required to exchange information about the entire network topology, but only locally available information is considered [6]. Encounter Based Routing (EBR) [5] protocol sends a number of copies of messages during a contact opportunity is proportional to the ratio of the Encounter Values of the nodes. By utilizing a concept of EBR, we have proposed SimBet multi-copy routing scheme that sends a number of copies of messages based on proportion of SimBetUtility values of the nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%