2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01223-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encountering Child Abuse and Neglect in Home Visiting: a Qualitative Study of Visitor and Supervisor Experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cuthill identified that working in the client's home may remove some professional barriers, facilitating relationship building (Cuthill & Johnston, 2019). However, nurses in many of the studies were aware of the double‐edged nature of the nurse‐client relationship,
Nurses consistently described their relationships with the families they served as being critical for the program to be successful, and this cornerstone was also related to how they managed the process of reporting (Holland et al, 2021, p. 7).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cuthill identified that working in the client's home may remove some professional barriers, facilitating relationship building (Cuthill & Johnston, 2019). However, nurses in many of the studies were aware of the double‐edged nature of the nurse‐client relationship,
Nurses consistently described their relationships with the families they served as being critical for the program to be successful, and this cornerstone was also related to how they managed the process of reporting (Holland et al, 2021, p. 7).
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses consistently described their relationships with the families they served as being critical for the program to be successful, and this cornerstone was also related to how they managed the process of reporting (Holland et al, 2021, p. 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This possibility is consistent with the higher surveillance bias estimate when a 3-month window was used and a lower surveillance bias estimate when a 12-month window was used, which suggested that reports shortly before the family exited the program contribute more to surveillance bias. Although it is possible that a family leaving the program could trigger a report by a concerned home visitor, we did not encounter this situation in a recent qualitative study of this program (Holland et al, 2021). It is more likely that a report contributed to the family exiting the program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we would expect our estimate to be higher than these previously reported estimates because ours included indirect surveillance bias, it was similar to the higher of the previous estimates, which either did not include indirect surveillance bias or included only some indirect sources. It is unclear how the home visitor background would impact the estimate, but training and experience may impact a home visitor’s recognition of maltreatment and decisions around reporting (Holland et al, 2021). The lower estimate by Duggan et al may reflect differences in training and/or the method of detecting surveillance bias; these authors reviewed home visitor documentation while we relied on CPS records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%