2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01088-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Encountering ethics through design: a workshop with nonhuman participants

Abstract: What if we began to speculate that intelligent things have an ethical agenda? Could we then imagine ways to move past the moral divide ‘human vs. nonhuman’ in those contexts, where things act on our behalf? Would this help us better address matters of agency and responsibility in the design and use of intelligent systems? In this article, we argue that if we fail to address intelligent things as objects that deserve moral consideration by their relations within a broad social context, we will lack a grip on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 4.1.4 Decentering Conventional Scales of Representation. Morethan-human design and sustainable HCI (SHCI) are growing areas of research, frequently confronting the implicit anthropocentric narcissism of emerging technologies (see e.g., [50,56,79,89,107]).…”
Section: Materializing Distributions Of Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 4.1.4 Decentering Conventional Scales of Representation. Morethan-human design and sustainable HCI (SHCI) are growing areas of research, frequently confronting the implicit anthropocentric narcissism of emerging technologies (see e.g., [50,56,79,89,107]).…”
Section: Materializing Distributions Of Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first experiment consisted of a series of workshops in 2020, in which we invited 36 designers and researchers across different fields to interview CAs, enact new interactions and materialise different embodiments (Nicenboim et al, 2020). The interviews were conducted with the smart speakers Alexa, Home, and Siri, using the method Interview with Things (Chang et al, 2017) combined with speculating responses (Reddy et al, 2020; 2021) Fig. 2.…”
Section: Experiments #1: In Conversation With Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have also highlighted the politics and ethics of MTHD, with issues of participation [10], supporting values such as equality and justice, and including perspectives (humans and nonhumans) that have been traditionally ignored in design processes [1,16]. Some of these issues were highlighted in various design fictions [11,34,35,38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%