Encountering suffering in digital care: a qualitative study of providers’ experiences in telemental health care

Abstract

Background Encountering patients who are suffering is common in health care, and particularly when providing mental health care. Telehealth technologies are increasingly used to provide mental health care, yet little is known about the experiences of providers when encountering patients who are suffering within remote care. The present study explored health care providers’ lived experiences of encountering patient suffering during telemental health care. Methods A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to uncover participants’ experiences. In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of physicians, psychologists, and therapists who used telemental health in varied clinical practices in Sweden. Data were analyzed using descriptive phenomenology. Results Telehealth care with patients who were suffering was experienced by providers as loose connections, both literally in compromised functioning of the technology and figuratively in a compromised ability connecting emotionally with patients. Providers’ lived experiences were explicated into the following aspects: insecurity in digital practice, inaccessibility of the armamentarium, and conviction in the value of telehealth care. Interpersonal connection between patient and provider is necessary. Worry and guilt arose for providers with fears that technology would not work, patient status was deteriorated, or the care needed could not be delivered. Providers overcame barriers in telehealth encounters, and expressed they perceived that patients appreciated the care received, and through it found relief. Conclusions This study brings an understanding of experiences in providing telemental care for patients who are suffering. Providers experience challenges in connecting with patients, and in accessing tools needed to enable reaching the goals of the caring encounter. Efforts to ensure functioning of technology, comfort with its use, and accessibility of tools might be some accommodations to support providers for successful and rewarding telehealth care encounters.

Changes in Televisit Modalities Due to the COVID Pandemic in Chile: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction

“…Participants from each cohort were recruited at different times -the assisted televisit during 2015-2019 and the televisit cohort during 2020. Since the latter cohort had an additional stressor, i.e., a quarantine confinement during a very publicized pandemic, lower satisfaction scores may be explained, at least in part, because of a higher psychological stress on patients rather than the actual televisit perception [21]. Conversely, the assisted televisit cohort of patients belonged to only one specialty (adult neurology) with over five years of experience with telemedicine programs, while the televisit cohort belonged to 15 different specialties that did not have prior experience in this field.…”

E-therapists’ views on the acceptability and feasibility of an internet-administered, guided, low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: A qualitative study

“…Technical challenges, such as interruptions to video or sound, have been suggested to be problematic in the provision of digital psychological interventions, limiting communication and potentially negatively impacting the therapeutic relationship. 75 …”