Encouraging Help Across Projects

Abstract

Companies struggle with timely project execution despite employing sophisticated management methods. Although help across projects is critical for time performance, it has not been explicitly incorporated into project management (PM) systems. We model a PM system, based on an innovative real-life practice, that both incorporates and shapes project managers’ helping behavior. A help process is at the core of this system, in which project managers may ask for and provide help while top management facilitates such exchanges. We find that companies should take a nuanced approach when designing help exchange and time-based incentives in tandem. A company that faces high project rewards after delays and highly effective help can benefit from inducing help because doing so enables the pursuit of projects it might abandon if delayed or even at the outset. The formal help process delivers value by creating and exploiting interdependencies between projects. These interdependencies allow project prioritization by inducing different effort levels in otherwise identical projects. A help process also allows the company to “tune” the timing of efforts by front-loading or back-loading project work. The benefits of a help system accrue through cost efficiencies, increased probability of success under help, and intertemporal incentive effects that encourage early efforts. However, because the help process creates the opportunity for free riding, a help system is not always recommended and a no-help system may perform better, especially when there are low project rewards after delay and low opportunity costs for project work. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management.

Managing uncertain tasks in technology‐intensive project environments: A multi‐method study of task closure and capacity management decisions

“…Likewise, future studies can examine the role of task‐related help and knowledge provided to engineers in influencing task closure decisions (cf. Crama et al, ).…”

Knowledge sharing in project-based supply networks

“…Both bonus and penalty provisions are commonly used in inter-organizational projects to govern suppliers' behavior and motivate desired actions (e.g. Crama et al, 2019;Han et al, 2019;Kwon et al, 2010;Roels et al, 2010;Siemsen et al, 2007). Penalties (e.g.…”

“…With respect to knowledge sharing outcomes, prior work supports a positive effect of incentive provisions within a project context (Meng and Gallagher, 2012). By focusing effort on achieving rewards or avoiding penalties, they act to enhance an individual boundary-spanner's motivation to share knowledge (Crama et al, 2019;Siemsen et al, 2007). Crama et al (2019), for example, investigated the role of bonuses in aligning individuals' goals and outcomes to promote mutual help and knowledge sharing within new product development projects.…”

“…First, while both bonus and penalty provisions have independently been shown to have positive effects on knowledge sharing motivation (e.g. Crama et al, 2019;Siemsen et al, 2007), the effectiveness of such provisions in the presence of other governance mechanisms has largely been overlooked (Foss et al, 2010). This is a particularly important omission in project-based supply networks, where multiple mechanisms operate in parallel to Project-based supply networks control suppliers' behavior (Oliveira and Lumineau, 2017).…”

Innovation and New Product Development: Reflections and Insights from the Research Published in the First 20 Years of Manufacturing & Service Operations Management

“…Yet it seems as if the literature has gone quiet, with some exceptions recognizing the distributed nature of the innovation tasks and projects (Mihm et al 2003, Sosa et al 2004, Bhaskaran and Krishnan 2009, Gokpinar et al 2010, Mihm 2010, Erat and Krishnan 2012, Hutchison-Krupat and Chao 2014. Recent studies have attempted to look into the behavioral dimension of managing innovation projects (Wu et al 2014, Rahmani et al 2017, Crama et al 2018, Long et al 2019. Still, core questions remain about effective collaboration during innovation projects and the capacity to ensure timely and on-budget delivery of the intended innovation outcomes.…”