End-of-Life Cancer Care Resource Utilisation in Rural Versus Urban Settings: A Systematic Review

Abstract

<jats:p>Background: Despite the advances in End-of-life (EOL) cancer care, disparities remain in the accessibility and utilisation of EOL cancer care resources. Often explained by socio-demographic factors, geographic variation exists in the availability and provision of EOL cancer care services among EOL cancer decedents across urban versus rural settings. This systematic review aims to synthesise mortality follow-back studies on the patterns of EOL cancer care resource use for adults (&gt;18 years) during end-of-life cancer care. Methods: Five databases were searched and data analysed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria involved; a) original research; b) quantitative studies; c) English language; d) palliative care related service use in adults (&gt;18 years) with any malignancy excluding non-melanoma skin cancers; e) exclusive end of life focus; f) urban-rural focus. Narrative reviews and discussions were excluded. Results: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. End-of-life cancer care service utilisation patterns varied by rurality and treatment intent. Rurality was strongly associated with higher rates of Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospitalisations and lower rates of hospice care. The largest inequities between urban and rural health service utilisation patterns were explained by individual level factors including age, gender, proximity to service and survival time from cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Rurality is an important predictor for poorer outcomes in end-of-life cancer care. Findings suggest that addressing the disparities in the urban-rural continuum is critical for efficient and equitable palliative cancer care. Further research is needed to understand barriers to service access and usage to achieve optimal EOL care for all cancer patient populations.</jats:p>

Patient-Reported Symptom Complexity and Acute Care Utilization Among Patients With Cancer: A Population-Based Study Using a Novel Symptom Complexity Algorithm and Observational Data

“…40 Rural residents may also have less access to supportive care resources typically available in the larger metro cancer centers. [40][41][42] Improving access to care in rural areas remains a problematic issue; however, recent advances in CCA's virtual care strategy presents an important opportunity to help rural patients access and use cancer care services more easily. 43 Additionally, patients with higher CCI scores were more likely to have an ED visit or HA.…”

Time to End-of-Life of Patients Starting Specialised Palliative Care in Denmark: A Descriptive Register-Based Cohort Study

“…One explanation could be the difference between living in a rural and an urban area of the country. Studies show that patients living in rural areas and patients living in lower-income neighbourhoods are less likely to be referred to palliative care in comparison with patients living in urban areas [ 33 , 34 ]. Furthermore, Adsersen et al suggest that part of the explanation for the Danish regional variation could be related to inequity in capacity [ 23 ].…”

Palliative Care Unit at Home: Impact on Quality of Life in Cancer Patients at the End of Life in a Rural Environment

“…As reported in previous publications, patients suffering from terminal conditions and living in areas with a higher geographical spread tend to demand more unplanned medical visits, particularly in the emergency department. 20,39 Interestingly, although the Alcoy Health Department provides health-care in a predominantly rural area, the prominent role of our HPCU enables health assistance of patients with advanced cancer centered in symptomatic control at home, and, importantly, a high rate of patients are able to pass away at home.…”