2015
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h1479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End stigmatizing language in tuberculosis research and practice

Abstract: Terms that invoke metaphors of transgression and punishment cause harm, say Mike Frick, Dalene von Delft, and Blessina Kumar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This raises ethical issues about the way communities are represented in research and in TB control programmes. [82][83][84] Few studies embraced a SDH framework to render legible the experiences of participants and there was a tendency to homogenize experiences of a diverse range of migrants, rather than theorize difference according to social positioning (e.g., gender). Despite a global consensus on the relevance of the social determinants of TB and the relevance and recognition of a SDH framework across many research disciplines, including the global policy world, they are often not effectively translated into policy and action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises ethical issues about the way communities are represented in research and in TB control programmes. [82][83][84] Few studies embraced a SDH framework to render legible the experiences of participants and there was a tendency to homogenize experiences of a diverse range of migrants, rather than theorize difference according to social positioning (e.g., gender). Despite a global consensus on the relevance of the social determinants of TB and the relevance and recognition of a SDH framework across many research disciplines, including the global policy world, they are often not effectively translated into policy and action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terms such as ‘TB suspect’ and ‘default’ have criminal connotations 49 and there has been an increasing emphasis on avoiding the use of such stigmatizing terminology. Goffman’s definition of stigma 50 was reworked and applied to HIV by Alonzo and Reynolds 51 who described stigma as being a ‘powerful discrediting and tainting social label that radically changes the way individuals view themselves and are viewed as persons.’ This definition also introduces the concepts of external and internal stigma.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 10 The risk and fear of transmission of the airborne infection are often raised in defence of policies and practices that prioritise the well-being of the collective public over that of individual patients. 11 Persons with TB or presumed to have TB continue to be subjected to stigmatising language (eg, ‘TB suspects’, ‘defaulters’), mandatory screening, testing and disease notification systems that lack privacy, contact investigations that label index patients, airborne respiratory isolation that prolongs their social isolation, directly observed treatment (DOT) that impedes individual autonomy, and in rare but relevant cases, legal detention and even incarceration of those who refuse or stop treatment. 7 11 12 As these practices continue to be applied in biomedical, public health-oriented ways, they fuel the social exclusion of people with TB, and reify assumed conflicts between public health and patient rights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%