2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

End-to-End diagnosis of breast biopsy images with transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 shows some examples of SOTA transformer architectures developed for histopathological image classification. For breast cancer histopathological image classification, DCET-Net [ 72 ] proposed a dual-stream convolution-expanded transformer architecture; Breast-Net [ 51 ] explores the ability of ensemble learning techniques using four Swin transformer architectures; HATNet [ 52 ] uses end-to-end vision transformers with a self-attention mechanism; ScoreNet [ 16 ] developed an efficient transformer-based architecture that integrates a coarse-grained global attention framework with a fine-grained local attention mechanism framework; LGVIT [ 73 ] built a local–global ViT model by introducing a new local–global MHSA mechanism and a ghost geed-forward network block into the network; dMIL-transformer [ 53 ] developed a two-stage double max–min multiple-instance learning (MIL) transformer architecture that combines both the spatial and morphological information of the cancer regions. Other than breast cancer classification, transformers have also been applied to other histopathological image cancer classification tasks, such as bone cancer classification (NRCA-FCFL [ 74 ]), brain cancer classification (ViT-WSI [ 17 ], ASI-DBNet [ 54 ], Ding et al [ 55 ]), colorectal cancer classification (MIST [ 75 ], DT-DSMIL [ 56 ]), gastric cancer classification (IMGL-VTNet [ 57 ]), kidney subtype classification (i-ViT [ 59 ], tRNAsformer [ 58 ]), thymoma or thymic carcinoma classification (MC-ViT [ 76 ]), lung cancer classification (GTP [ 46 ], FDTrans [ 60 ]), skin cancer classification (Wang et al [ 45 ]), and thyroid cancer classification (Wang et al [ 77 ], PyT2T-ViT [ 41 ], Wang et al [ 78 ]) using different transformer-based architectures.…”
Section: Current Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows some examples of SOTA transformer architectures developed for histopathological image classification. For breast cancer histopathological image classification, DCET-Net [ 72 ] proposed a dual-stream convolution-expanded transformer architecture; Breast-Net [ 51 ] explores the ability of ensemble learning techniques using four Swin transformer architectures; HATNet [ 52 ] uses end-to-end vision transformers with a self-attention mechanism; ScoreNet [ 16 ] developed an efficient transformer-based architecture that integrates a coarse-grained global attention framework with a fine-grained local attention mechanism framework; LGVIT [ 73 ] built a local–global ViT model by introducing a new local–global MHSA mechanism and a ghost geed-forward network block into the network; dMIL-transformer [ 53 ] developed a two-stage double max–min multiple-instance learning (MIL) transformer architecture that combines both the spatial and morphological information of the cancer regions. Other than breast cancer classification, transformers have also been applied to other histopathological image cancer classification tasks, such as bone cancer classification (NRCA-FCFL [ 74 ]), brain cancer classification (ViT-WSI [ 17 ], ASI-DBNet [ 54 ], Ding et al [ 55 ]), colorectal cancer classification (MIST [ 75 ], DT-DSMIL [ 56 ]), gastric cancer classification (IMGL-VTNet [ 57 ]), kidney subtype classification (i-ViT [ 59 ], tRNAsformer [ 58 ]), thymoma or thymic carcinoma classification (MC-ViT [ 76 ]), lung cancer classification (GTP [ 46 ], FDTrans [ 60 ]), skin cancer classification (Wang et al [ 45 ]), and thyroid cancer classification (Wang et al [ 77 ], PyT2T-ViT [ 41 ], Wang et al [ 78 ]) using different transformer-based architectures.…”
Section: Current Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a reliable diagnostic system, it is important to obtain representations that reflect both the content and context of the input biopsy image. HATNet, a system we developed originally for breast biopsy analysis, achieved this using a top-down and bottom-up approach (Mehta et al, 2022 ). Pathologists describe using a different viewing behavior before making their diagnosis of breast tissue compared with their assessment of skin biopsy images.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach overlooks the histological and morphological features of tumor cells with its matrix. With the development of digital pathological equipment and decreasing storage costs, the application of digital pathology has generated considerable enthusiasm as a useful tool to assist pathologists in reporting the pathological results of tumor tissue . Importantly, digital H-E images combined with machine learning methods could objectively and automatically extract quantitative pathological information, so-called pathomics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of digital pathological equipment and decreasing storage costs, the application of digital pathology has generated considerable enthusiasm as a useful tool to assist pathologists in reporting the pathological results of tumor tissue. 8,9 Importantly, digital H-E images combined with machine learning methods could objectively and automatically extract quantitative pathological information, so-called pathomics. 10,11 Previous studies have indicated that pathomics combined with artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to estimate the prognosis of hepatocellular cancer, renal cell cancer, and colorectal cancer lung metastasis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%