1996
DOI: 10.17161/kwpl.1808.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endangered Languages Data Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency to conform to community norms led one linguist to assert that the size of the language group is one ‘of the most obvious influences on the vitality of a language’(Grenoble and Whaley 1998: ix). Other researchers disagree and assert that the influence of size of the language group on language maintenance is inconclusive, shedding light only when evaluated within the context of the larger community (Yamamoto 1997).…”
Section: Minority Status (Minorstat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The tendency to conform to community norms led one linguist to assert that the size of the language group is one ‘of the most obvious influences on the vitality of a language’(Grenoble and Whaley 1998: ix). Other researchers disagree and assert that the influence of size of the language group on language maintenance is inconclusive, shedding light only when evaluated within the context of the larger community (Yamamoto 1997).…”
Section: Minority Status (Minorstat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency to conform to community norms led one linguist to assert that the size of the language group is one 'of the most obvious in£uences on the vitality of a language' (Grenoble and Whaley 1998: ix). Other researchers disagree and assert that the in£uence of size of the language group on language maintenance is inconclusive, shedding light only when evaluated within the context of the larger community (Yamamoto 1997). The latter idea, which asserts that it is not the size of the language group but the size of the language group in relation to the larger community, was included in the regression to test the sociolinguists' assertions quantitatively.…”
Section: Minority Status (Minorstat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if this is the only text in a recommendation letter, it will typically receive a different (negative) interpretation. Several contextual factors can affect the interpretation of a sentence, such as the question under discussion (Groenendijk & Stokhof, 1984 ; Roberts, 1996 ); the comparison class (Kamp & Partee, 1995 ; Kennedy & McNally, 2005 ); the speaker's previous usage (Schuster & Degen, 2020 ); and speaker knowledgeability (Bergen & Grodner, 2012 ; Goodman & Stuhlmüller, 2013 ; Hochstein, Bale, Fox, & Barner, 2016 ; Dieuleveut, Chemla, & Spector, 2019 ; Spychalska, Reimer, Schumacher, & Werning, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%