2017
DOI: 10.3102/0162373717725804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ending to What End? The Impact of the Termination of Court-Desegregation Orders on Residential Segregation and School Dropout Rates

Abstract: In the early 1990s, the Supreme Court established standards to facilitate the release of school districts from racial desegregation orders. Over the next two decades, federal courts declared almost half of all districts under court order in 1991 to be "unitary"-that is, to have met their obligations to eliminate dual systems of education. I leverage a comprehensive dataset of all districts that were under court order in 1991 to assess the national effects of the termination of desegregation orders on indices o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, this assumption would be violated if neighborhood characteristics changed in a given district in response to a local court decision and also affected CVD. While this assumption is not directly testable, we believe it unlikely that families relocated following a court order in their district [74]. Empirical evidence also supports few changes in residential segregation levels in released districts [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, this assumption would be violated if neighborhood characteristics changed in a given district in response to a local court decision and also affected CVD. While this assumption is not directly testable, we believe it unlikely that families relocated following a court order in their district [74]. Empirical evidence also supports few changes in residential segregation levels in released districts [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While this assumption is not directly testable, we believe it unlikely that families relocated following a court order in their district [74]. Empirical evidence also supports few changes in residential segregation levels in released districts [75]. We further described below several sensitivity tests to explore this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Families were willing to live in slightly more integrated neighborhoods when the amenity of the local school was removed. Conversely, after the school desegregation order expired in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school district, white families were more likely to move to neighborhoods with more white neighbors (Liebowitz and Page 2014) and white-Hispanic segregation increased in the short run (Liebowitz 2018). The relaxation of explicit racial balancing rules made where one lives once again very consequential for where one's child attends school.…”
Section: Breaking the Link: Student Assignment Policies And Demographic Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper takes advantage of the variation in the timing of school districts’ release from court oversight at the county level. It exploits a similar source of variation as Liebowitz (2018) [ 40 ] and Reardon et al (2012) [ 38 ] and uses the same empirical strategy as Guryan (2004), Johnson (2015), Reber (2005), and Shen (2018) [ 17 , 41 43 ]. The timing of release from court oversight is considered random due to the unequal caseloads across district courts, the varying and somewhat unpredictable duration of the release process, the varying court approaches, and the timing of appeals from interested parties [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%