2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.14.500068
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ending transmission of SARS-CoV-2: sterilizing immunity using an intranasal subunit vaccine

Abstract: Immunization programs against SARS-CoV-2 with commercial intramuscular (IM) vaccines prevent disease but not infections. The continued evolution of variants of concern (VOC) like Delta and Omicron has increased infections even in countries with high vaccination coverage. This is due to commercial vaccines being unable to prevent viral infection in the upper airways and exclusively targeting the spike (S) protein that is subject to continuous evolution facilitating immune escape. Here we report a multi-antigen,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 78 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the intramuscular COVID-19 vaccine only elicits strong IgG responses and not mucosal secretory IgA (sIgA) responses, while circulating IgG cannot effectively protect the upper respiratory tract from infection [ 6 , 13 , 14 ]. Therefore, mucosal vaccines that can stimulate sIgA production on the mucosal surface of the respiratory tract and that can thereby provide sterilizing immunity by blocking the virus at the entry point and preventing the initial replication of the virus, would be preferable [ 15 , 16 ]. Additionally, the intramuscular injection has low compliance due to needle phobia, logistical limitations of cold-chain transport, and the necessity for trained medical professionals, which dramatically diminishes the possibility of rapid mass vaccination, particularly in developing nations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the intramuscular COVID-19 vaccine only elicits strong IgG responses and not mucosal secretory IgA (sIgA) responses, while circulating IgG cannot effectively protect the upper respiratory tract from infection [ 6 , 13 , 14 ]. Therefore, mucosal vaccines that can stimulate sIgA production on the mucosal surface of the respiratory tract and that can thereby provide sterilizing immunity by blocking the virus at the entry point and preventing the initial replication of the virus, would be preferable [ 15 , 16 ]. Additionally, the intramuscular injection has low compliance due to needle phobia, logistical limitations of cold-chain transport, and the necessity for trained medical professionals, which dramatically diminishes the possibility of rapid mass vaccination, particularly in developing nations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%