2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endobronchial Ultrasound and Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases of de novo lymphoma, the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was found to be very low, despite underrepresentation of Hodgkin and high-grade NHL cases in these patient cohorts (25-51%), which questions its clinical role in this context (14,18). Moreover, the ability of FNAC in general and EBUS-TBNA specifically to accurately subtype lymphoma has been questioned (5,14,18). The use of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphomas is therefore uncertain and of questionable value in cases of de novo lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In cases of de novo lymphoma, the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was found to be very low, despite underrepresentation of Hodgkin and high-grade NHL cases in these patient cohorts (25-51%), which questions its clinical role in this context (14,18). Moreover, the ability of FNAC in general and EBUS-TBNA specifically to accurately subtype lymphoma has been questioned (5,14,18). The use of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphomas is therefore uncertain and of questionable value in cases of de novo lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous studies that evaluated the role of EBUS-TBNA in lymphoma diagnosis (14-18) reported mostly on cases with suspected disease relapse; they included only a very small number of high-grade NHL or Hodgkin lymphomas and provided limited data on further lymphoma subclassification. In cases of de novo lymphoma, the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA was found to be very low, despite underrepresentation of Hodgkin and high-grade NHL cases in these patient cohorts (25-51%), which questions its clinical role in this context (14,18). Moreover, the ability of FNAC in general and EBUS-TBNA specifically to accurately subtype lymphoma has been questioned (5,14,18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent retrospective analysis, the overall sensitivity and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing lymphoma were 65% and 96%, respectively (38). However, it is important to note that other studies over the last 8-year have found wide variability in the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for lymphoma (39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45). Most studies are limited by small sample sizes and differences in disease recurrence, as well as mixtures of patients with Hodgkins lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL).…”
Section: Ebusmentioning
confidence: 99%