2015
DOI: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endobronchial Ultrasound versus Mediastinoscopy for Mediastinal Nodal Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract: EBUS-TBNA was superior to mediastinoscopy in terms of its diagnostic performance for mediastinal staging of cN1-3 NSCLC. Because EBUS-TBNA is both less invasive and affords superior diagnostic sensitivity, it should be the first-line procedure performed in patients with NSCLC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
137
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
137
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This rapidly growing body of literature has, in fact, led to the publication of two sets of EBUS clinical guidelines (3,5). Clinical trials with head to head comparisons of EBUS-TBNA vs. cervical mediastinoscopy (CM) for mediastinal staging of lung cancer have shown comparable accuracy and, not surprisingly, a more favorable safety profile in favor of EBUS-TBNA (6)(7)(8). Moreover, a more recent prospective comparison performed by Um and coworkers showed EBUS to be superior to CM with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 81% and negative predictive value of 85% vs. 79% (P<0.05) (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rapidly growing body of literature has, in fact, led to the publication of two sets of EBUS clinical guidelines (3,5). Clinical trials with head to head comparisons of EBUS-TBNA vs. cervical mediastinoscopy (CM) for mediastinal staging of lung cancer have shown comparable accuracy and, not surprisingly, a more favorable safety profile in favor of EBUS-TBNA (6)(7)(8). Moreover, a more recent prospective comparison performed by Um and coworkers showed EBUS to be superior to CM with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 81% and negative predictive value of 85% vs. 79% (P<0.05) (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials with head to head comparisons of EBUS-TBNA vs. cervical mediastinoscopy (CM) for mediastinal staging of lung cancer have shown comparable accuracy and, not surprisingly, a more favorable safety profile in favor of EBUS-TBNA (6)(7)(8). Moreover, a more recent prospective comparison performed by Um and coworkers showed EBUS to be superior to CM with a sensitivity of 88% vs. 81% and negative predictive value of 85% vs. 79% (P<0.05) (7). The cost effectiveness of EBUS-TBNA over mediastinoscopy has also been shown in several studies (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one large randomized control trial compared surgical staging or combined EBUS-TBNA and transesophageal ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) followed by surgical staging (41), EBUS CP guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) is now the first choice for mediastinal LN staging (9,42). Another single arm study also supports that EBUS TBNA is better than mediastinoscopy (43). EBUS TBNA is not only a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed repeatedly, but also has higher sensitivity and specificity in specific lymph node stations (9,44).…”
Section: Ebus Cpmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, it can be limited with the small size of the sampled specimens, lack of access to the posterior lymph node stations and variable operator efficiency. If EBUS guided biopsy is negative for malignancy, additional biopsy usually with mediastinoscopy might be needed [10,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%