SUMMARYWe conducted this study to verify the efficacy of ventricular unipolar potential (Vuni) for ablation of idiopathic non-reentrant ventricular tachycardia (idio-VT). The morphology of V-uni at the successful and unsuccessful sites was analyzed in 27 patients with idio-VT [20 with right ventricular outflow tachycardia (RVOVT) and 7 with left ventricular outflow tachycardia (LVOVT)]. The usefulness of V-uni was compared with a pacemapping method and the V-QRS interval. The incidence of QS-pattern V-uni at the successful and best unsuccessful sites were 100 versus 25% (P = 0.000005) in RVOVT and 86 versus 29% (P = 0.10) in LVOVT. The pacemapping scores at the successful and best unsuccessful sites were 11.5/12 versus 11.2/12; NS in RVOVT, and 11.2/12 versus 11.1/12; NS in LVOVT. The mean V-QRS interval at the successful and the best unsuccessful sites were 22.5 ± 3.8 versus 21.6 ± 3.4 msec; NS in RVOVT, 15.1 ± 3.2 versus 12.5 ± 3.3 msec; NS in LVOVT. The sensitivity (sen) and specificity (spe) of QS-pattern V-uni to determine the optimum target sites were 1.0 and 0.89 in RVOVT and 0.86 and 0.83 in LVOVT, respectively. In the ablation of idio-VT, QS-pattern V-uni is simply and visually identifiable, is very useful, and should be given a high priority when determining the optimum target site. (Jpn Heart J 2004; 45: 749-760) Key words: Radiofrequency catheter ablation, Idiopathic non-reentrant ventricular tachycardia, Right ventricular outflow tachycardia, Left ventricular outflow tachycardia, Ventricular unipolar potential RADIOFREQUENCY catheter ablation for the treatment of idiopathic nonreentrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) has already become an established method. [1][2][3][4][5] However, the precise landmarks with which we choose the optimal target site still remain controversial. The usefulness of unipolar potential for targeting the exit site of an arrhythmia circuit has been pointed out.6) We hypothesized that, in idiopathic non-reentrant right or left ventricular outflow From the