“…Although bioarchaeological goals of reconstructing past lifeways likely contribute to this emphasis, a greater emphasis on the physiologically integrated pathways can improve our understanding of skeletal responses to cultural factors (Agarwal, 2016; Geber & Murphy, 2012; Klaus & Tam, 2009; Watts, 2015). Studies centered on the physiological integration of the skeletal system tend to focus predominately on interactions between metabolic and skeletal systems (Brickley, 2018; Devlin, 2015; Ives & Humphrey, 2018; Snoddy et al, 2018), especially in relation to Vitamin D and C homeostasis. New research, however, is engaging with hormonal‐skeletal interactions (Gosman, Stout, & Larsen, 2011; Western & Bekvalac, 2017), and following calls for more interdisciplinary engagement (Klaus, 2014), bioarchaeologists have made strides to bridge osteoimmunology with bioarchaeology (Crespo, Klaes, Switala, & DeWitte, 2017; Rivera & Mirazón Lahr, 2017).…”