1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1987.tb00630.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endodontic treatment of experimentally induced apical periodontitis in dogs

Abstract: A total of 44 roots with periradicular inflammation, induced by inoculation of Streptococcus faecalis, were treated endodontically. All root canals were prepared with K‐reamers using 0.5% solution of sodium hypochlorite for irrigation. Bacteriological specimens demonstrated growth in all teeth when the root‐canal fillings were made. In all, 22 roots were filled with gutta‐percha, 11 roots with a calcium hydroxide preparation (Cala‐sept®) and 11 roots with Calasept®+ Dionosil®, an iodinized radio‐graphic contra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Under these premises, the Kaplan–Meier statistic and the Cox's regression analysis were recalculated. The results of these simulations summarized in Table 8 underline that the difference between both treatment modalities remained negligible and proved not to be statistically significant; this confirmed the results of a comparative study on periapical healing in dogs ( Allard et al . 1987 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Under these premises, the Kaplan–Meier statistic and the Cox's regression analysis were recalculated. The results of these simulations summarized in Table 8 underline that the difference between both treatment modalities remained negligible and proved not to be statistically significant; this confirmed the results of a comparative study on periapical healing in dogs ( Allard et al . 1987 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It has also been shown to survive as a mono-infection in root canals (Moller et al 1981, Fabricius et al 1982 and is capable of eliciting a periapical host response Table 4 The results of the multivariate regression framed to answer the third question: 'which is the best experimental solution (both with and without ultrasound)?' To address this question, confidence intervals were constructed comparing each group with the group which was most effective in reducing the number of bacteria (Allard et al 1987). The difficulty with the infected tooth model is that despite using standard inocula, variability is introduced by tooth anatomy and the individual growth responses within each tooth during the 48-h incubation period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enterococcus faecalis has been implicated in apical periodontitis (Allard et al 1987) as well as root canal treatment failure (Molander et al 1998, Sundqvist et al 1998. It is thought to be amongst the most resistant bacteria associated with root canal infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several intracanal dressings used for teeth with no pulp vitality and with chronic periapical lesions, calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH) 2 ) has been regarded as the best option, and it has been widely recommended and used because of its proven antibacterial properties (1), periapical tissue healing stimulation (2), biocompatibility (3), antiexudate activity (4), and necrotic tissues dissolution propriety (5). The dissociation of Ca(OH) 2 into calcium and hydroxyl ions is responsible for the alkalinization of the cavity, which is not conducive to bacterial development and proliferation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%