2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous cystinyl aminopeptidase in Chinese hamster ovary cells: characterization by [125I]Ang IV binding and catalytic activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, these substances are not required for the enzyme activity assay. Whereas highaffinity binding of [ 125 I]-Ang IV can only be detected with the apo-enzyme, inhibition of enzyme activity occurs to the native enzyme [182].…”
Section: Mechanism(s) Of Action Of Angiotensin IV Through Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, these substances are not required for the enzyme activity assay. Whereas highaffinity binding of [ 125 I]-Ang IV can only be detected with the apo-enzyme, inhibition of enzyme activity occurs to the native enzyme [182].…”
Section: Mechanism(s) Of Action Of Angiotensin IV Through Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endogenous angiotensins Ang IV, and to a lesser extent angiotensin III, were able to inhibit the aminopeptidase activity of the brain homogenate ( P = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively, Friedman's test) (Figure 2); angiotensin II was without significant effect at the concentrations studied. The fact that Ang IV was able to inhibit the activity by approximately 60% at a concentration of 10 µ m indicates that IRAP probably accounts for the majority of the aminopeptidase activity; Ang IV is known to selectively inhibit IRAP with an IC 50 (inhibitory concentration 50%: concentration required to reduce the response by 50%) of approximately 1 µ m [15] . Of the synthetic peptides, [des‐Val 1 ]‐angiotensin IV, Ac‐angiotensin IV‐NH 2 , angiotensin IV‐NH 2 and [des‐His 4 ]‐angiotensin IV all inhibited IRAP to the same extent as Ang IV at similar concentrations ( P = 0.014; 0.002; 0.002 and 0.002, respectively, Friedman's test).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine aminopeptidase activity and the inhibitory effects of Ang IV, a method based on the cleavage of l ‐leucine‐ p ‐nitroanilide into l ‐leucine and p ‐nitroaniline was employed [14] . p ‐Nitroaniline shows a characteristic absorption at 405 nm upon cleavage by aminopeptidases [15] . Male C57BL/6 mice, all bred and raised in‐house, were sacrificed and whole brains removed and immediately placed in ice‐cold extraction buffer (50 m m Tris, 0.25 m sucrose, 140 m m NaCl pH 7.5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, systemic and intrarenal administration of Ang IV reduced RBF in rats when measured using pulsed Doppler flow probes placed around the renal artery, and this response was prevented by AT 1 receptor blockade. 44,131,132 Infusion of LVV-H7, a more stable ligand with a high affinity (K i B73 nM) for the AT 4 receptor, but no affinity for AT 1 receptors, 133 failed to alter RBF. 132 One study in anesthetized rats reported that intrarenal Ang IV produced an AT 1 receptordependent biphasic response with an immediate dose-dependent vasoconstriction, followed by a prolonged vasodilation.…”
Section: Angiotensin II At 1 and At 2 Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%