1990
DOI: 10.3386/w3283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endogenous Market Structures in International Trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The key prediction of traditional models in this literature is that firms will invest abroad when the gains from avoiding trade costs outweigh the costs of maintaining capacity in multiple markets (e.g. Markusen, 1984;Horstmann and Markusen, 1992;Brainard, 1997;Markusen and Venables, 2000). Our paper shows that, when firms are uncertain about their profitability in foreign markets, they may start by testing these markets via exports -the mode characterized by lower fixed costs -before switching to FDI.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The key prediction of traditional models in this literature is that firms will invest abroad when the gains from avoiding trade costs outweigh the costs of maintaining capacity in multiple markets (e.g. Markusen, 1984;Horstmann and Markusen, 1992;Brainard, 1997;Markusen and Venables, 2000). Our paper shows that, when firms are uncertain about their profitability in foreign markets, they may start by testing these markets via exports -the mode characterized by lower fixed costs -before switching to FDI.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in line with the proximityconcentration tradeoff literature (e.g. Markusen, 1984;Horstmann and Markusen, 1992;Brainard, 1997;Markusen and Venables, 2000), we focus on a setting wherefirms choose to serve a foreign market either via exports or horizontal FDI and assume a cost asymmetry these two modes: exporting involves a lower fixed cost, while FDI involves lower variable costs. As discussed in Appendix A.3, the logic of our theoretical model applies to a setting where exporting firms chooses whether or not to invest in a foreign distribution network.…”
Section: Export and Fdi Choices Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis departs from standard theoretical models in this literature (e.g., Horstmann and Markusen, 1992;Brainard, 1993;Markusen and Venables, 2000) and from previous empirical studies (e.g., Brainard, 1997) by studying the role of uncertainty and experimentation in firms' decision. Recent papers by Helpman et al (2004) and Head and Ries (2003) highlight the importance of within-sector productivity differences in explaining a firm's choice over export and horizontal FDI and provide empirical evidence (based on cross-sectional evidence for US and Japanese firms) showing that the least productive firms serve only the domestic market, the relatively more productive firms export, and the most productive firms engage in FDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This all-or-nothing choice depends upon the demand factors and marginal cost differences identified above, but also upon the importance of firm-specific and plant-specific economies of scale. A horizontal model of MNC operations proposed by Horstmann and Markusen (1992) provides insight regarding what types of firms may choose to establish foreign affiliates and where they might choose to locate them. When there are large firm-specific economies of scale, perhaps from the ability to spread costs of research and development over additional units of output, and there are high costs of serving foreign markets from home country production, establishing foreign affiliates will be desirable.…”
Section: A Aggregate Mnc Production In Alternative Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%