2000
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-200008000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endoglin Expression as a Measure of Microvessel Density in Cervical Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neoplastic, inflammatory, mesechymal, and hematopoietic cells were not stained with endoglin. These observations have been also reported previously for other solid malignancies [4,7,26,29,30,35,44]. In addition, in our samples, lymphatic vessels were generally negative for endoglin, as confirmed with double staining with the specific lymphatic endothelium marker D2-40.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Neoplastic, inflammatory, mesechymal, and hematopoietic cells were not stained with endoglin. These observations have been also reported previously for other solid malignancies [4,7,26,29,30,35,44]. In addition, in our samples, lymphatic vessels were generally negative for endoglin, as confirmed with double staining with the specific lymphatic endothelium marker D2-40.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…An increasing amount of studies evaluating MVD with CD105, in various neoplasms, is being published [4,7,26,29,30,35,44]. So far, with no exceptions, in all of these studies, a significant association of high MVD with poor prognosis was observed, and investigators agree that assessment of microvessel counts with endoglin seems to be better than the use of any other pan-endothelial marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantification of tumor microvessel density, as determined by immunohistochemical staining for CD105, is a significant indicator of poor prognosis in patients with selected solid neoplasias including NSCLC (Tanaka et al, 2001), cervical cancer (Brewer et al, 2000), prostate cancer with Gleason score 5-7 (Wikstrom et al, 2002) and breast carcinoma (Kumar et al, 1999;Dales et al, 2003). Moreover, a weaker intensity of staining for CD105 was observed in T1 compared to T2, T3 or T4 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (Schimming and Marme, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have defined the role of CD105 as a powerful marker to quantify intratumoral microvessel density (IMVD) in solid and hematopoietic tumors including breast (Kumar et al, 1999), prostate (Wikstrom et al, 2002), cervical (Brewer et al, 2000), colorectal (Akagi et al, 2002) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Tanaka et al, 2001), and in multiple myeloma (Pruneri et al, 2002) and hairy cell leukemia (Pruneri et al, 2003). Moreover, in NSCLC, increased levels of angiopoietin-2 (an antagonist of angiopoietin-1) significantly correlated with higher IMVD assessed by immunohistochemical staining against CD105.…”
Section: Functional Implications In Angiogenesis Vascular Developmenmentioning
confidence: 99%