2022
DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.21.11972-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endograft apposition and infrarenal neck enlargement after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sufficient apposition and oversizing of the endograft in the aortic neck are both essential for durable endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). These measures are however not regularly stated on post-EVAR computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan reports. In this study endograft apposition and neck enlargement (NE) after EVAR with an Endurant II(s) endograft were analyzed and associated with supra-and infrarenal aortic neck morphology. METHODS:In 97 consecutive elective patients, the aortic neck morp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2.7 ± 1.9 mm infra-renal neck diameter increase in patients with rAAA was substantially more than the 0.9 ± 3.6 mm to 1.6 (1.0, 2.7) mm diameter increase reported for elective EVAR patients at the first postoperative CTA scan [ 11 , 16 ]. The neck diameter increase found in this study is comparable with >3 years of gradual aortic neck diameter increase in elective EVAR patients [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2.7 ± 1.9 mm infra-renal neck diameter increase in patients with rAAA was substantially more than the 0.9 ± 3.6 mm to 1.6 (1.0, 2.7) mm diameter increase reported for elective EVAR patients at the first postoperative CTA scan [ 11 , 16 ]. The neck diameter increase found in this study is comparable with >3 years of gradual aortic neck diameter increase in elective EVAR patients [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The endograft main body nominal diameter was obtained from the patient records. There were two endograft oversizing parameters defined: the planned pre-EVAR endograft oversizing and the effective post-EVAR endograft oversizing [ 11 ]. The planned pre- and the effective post-EVAR endograft oversizing were calculated from the nominal endograft diameter and the pre- and post-EVAR neck diameter at the lowest renal artery baseline, respectively, as shown in Formulas (1) and (2): …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group has also been described in a previous study. 21 Follow-up scans, either CTA or duplex ultrasound, were evaluated in July 2021 to assess the absence of EVAR-related complications. Patients with the longest duration of CTA or duplex ultrasound follow-up were selected, to match the number of patients in the T1aEL group.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nominal endograft diameter postÀEVAR neck diameter À 1 Â 100% 65 For post-EVAR outcomes, it is absolutely undesirable to pool different types of endoleak. Types 1a, 1b, 2, and 3 endoleak have different origins with different consequences, and the re-intervention strategy is different.…”
Section: Proposal For Standardisation Of Aortic and Evar Data In Futu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nominal endograft diameter postÀEVAR neck diameter À 1 Â 100% 65 Type of endoleak: documented as present or absent (including 1a, 1b, 2, 3). 62 Clinically relevant migration: migration resulting in a decrease in the real achieved sealing zone < 10 mm, documented as present or absent.…”
Section: Proposal For Standardisation Of Aortic and Evar Data In Futu...mentioning
confidence: 99%