were recorded. The increase in renal pelvic pressure was examined with increasing flow rates (0, 4, 8,12,16, 25 and 33 mL/min) with saline alone or saline + ISO 0.1 μ g/mL. Perfusion was initiated on the left side, with randomization for adding ISO or not. Thereafter perfusion was done on the right side as a control in each pig. The surgeons were unaware of whether ISO was added or not.
RESULTSThe mean ( SD ) baseline pelvic pressures in the saline and ISO group were 28 (7.1) and 25 (9.8) mmHg, respectively, with no significant difference ( P = 0.079). Endoluminal perfusion with ISO significantly inhibited the pelvic pressure increase to perfusion at all perfusion rates. The pressureflow relation was linear; the maximum relaxation (27%) was obtained at 4 mL/min, from 52 to 38 mmHg during saline alone and ISO 0.1 μ g/mL perfusion, respectively. The mean blood pressure did not change significantly ( P = 0.330). The mean ( SD ) heart rate in the saline and ISO group were 109 (4.5) and 97 (2.1) beats/min, respectively ( P < 0.001), i.e. a markedly greater rate in the saline than in the ISO group.
CONCLUSIONThe pressure-flow relation during semirigid ureterorenoscopy was linear. ISO 0.1 μ g/mL in saline significantly reduced the pressure-flow relation during semirigid ureterorenoscopy in this porcine model. ISO might be a potential additive to the irrigation fluid during upper urinary tract endoscopic procedures, minimizing pressure increases due to irrigation and manipulation.
KEYWORDSisoproterenol, pelvic pressure, endoluminal perfusion, ureterorenoscopy, cardiovascular function
OBJECTIVETo investigate the effects on the pressureflow relation of renal pelvic pressure during semirigid ureterorenoscopy and endoluminal perfusion of isoproterenol (ISO) 0.1 μ g/mL, with emphasis on local effects and cardiovascular side-effects, as topically administered ISO effectively and dosedependently causes relaxation of the upper urinary tract in pigs with no concomitant cardiovascular side-effects.