1988
DOI: 10.1097/00006254-198804000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endometrial Morphology and Peripheral Hormone Levels in Women with Regular Menstrual Cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors have reported that numbers of endometrial glands do not change during the natural cycle (Johannisson et al 1987, 1991, Wahab et al 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, some authors have reported that numbers of endometrial glands do not change during the natural cycle (Johannisson et al 1987, 1991, Wahab et al 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When assessing endometrial morphology, gland duct number has most frequently been used to quantify changes for diagnostic purposes or following clinical treatments in both humans and farm animals (Gonzalez et al 1985, Johannisson et al 1987, Wahab et al 1999, Gray et al 2001, Carpenter et al 2003. However, some authors have reported that numbers of endometrial glands do not change during the natural cycle (Johannisson et al 1987, 1991, Wahab et al 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was proposed that the dating of endometrium should be related to the serum LH surge, which corresponds to ovulation, rather than to the "ideal" 28-day cycle [28]. Endometrial histology is most consistent in biopsies from days LH −3/−2 to days LH +7/+8, when changes occur with a high degree of regularity regardless of the length of the preovulatory and postovulatory phases [28]. It is now a common practice to date endometrium according to days after the LH peak [29] [30].…”
Section: Endometrial Dating and The Window Of Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, on a large number of women, it was demonstrated that histological dating of the endometrium does not have the accuracy or the precision necessary for the diagnosis of luteal phase deficiency, or to guide clinical management of women with reproductive failure [26,27]. It was proposed that the dating of endometrium should be related to the serum LH surge, which corresponds to ovulation, rather than to the "ideal" 28-day cycle [28]. Endometrial histology is most consistent in biopsies from days LH −3/−2 to days LH +7/+8, when changes occur with a high degree of regularity regardless of the length of the preovulatory and postovulatory phases [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%